2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “real-life” variability of CA-125 in ovarian cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Area under pain curve Subjective/subject to recall Requires patient to report pain, which is a subjective measure and could report the same pain differently at a different time/by a different method or if previous scores were not provided [56], and recall incorrectly [57] CA125 Biological variability/ laboratory error Assay imprecision can contribute considerably to result variations in a conventional laboratory setting [58] and changes can occur due to normal biological variation [59] Creatinine on admission…”
Section: Predictor Key Reasons Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area under pain curve Subjective/subject to recall Requires patient to report pain, which is a subjective measure and could report the same pain differently at a different time/by a different method or if previous scores were not provided [56], and recall incorrectly [57] CA125 Biological variability/ laboratory error Assay imprecision can contribute considerably to result variations in a conventional laboratory setting [58] and changes can occur due to normal biological variation [59] Creatinine on admission…”
Section: Predictor Key Reasons Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3Y5 A primary issue with evaluating the clinical utility of the CA-125 antigen level is reliability. 3 Prior studies have suggested that the diagnostic relevance of the tumor marker reflects the patient's clinical condition and biological variation and that consistent increases correspond to disease progression or severity. 3,6,7 Because there is great difficulty in determining the significance of a single laboratory value that can be associated with extreme variability, 8Y11 patient management options reflecting CA-125 values should be exercised with discretion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TM levels obtained from peripheral blood samples were measured before TKI targeted therapy and after 7 and 14 days of treatment. To reduce TM levels' influence with inherent intra-individual biological variation and within-laboratory coefficients of variation (TM v ) [20][21][22], we defined a cutoff level for each individual using pre-treatment TM levels of 2-fold over the standard upper limit. Therefore, enrollment criteria included CEA, CA125, CA19-9, and CA15-3 levels at 10.0 ng/mL, 70 units/mL, 70 units/mL, and 76 units/mL, respectively.…”
Section: Serum Cea Ca125 Ca19-9 and Ca15-3 Level Detection And Anamentioning
confidence: 99%