2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2011.6019150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The REALISEGRID cost-benefit methodology to rank pan-European infrastructure investments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This is followed by the spatial planning phase wherein Source: Adapted from [17]. See also [16,[38][39][40] for a detailed description of the process; see [41] for a generic CBA description.…”
Section: Background: Pan-european Cost-benefit Analysis In Electricitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2). This is followed by the spatial planning phase wherein Source: Adapted from [17]. See also [16,[38][39][40] for a detailed description of the process; see [41] for a generic CBA description.…”
Section: Background: Pan-european Cost-benefit Analysis In Electricitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue frequently caused controversies in the past and increased national and local public and political resistance. Third, it is to increase transparency and improve communications with the public by providing best possible, objective information on cost and benefits of transmission grid expansion from a European perspective to affected stakeholders [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Background: Pan-european Cost-benefit Analysis In Electricitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations