2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reasons Behind U.S. Invasion of Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A striking example would be the concatenation of events that led to the Iraq War in 2003. In particular, the claim that the Iraqi regime possessed large numbers of weapons of mass destruction (which later proved to be false [51]) has been widely regarded as a pretextual justi cation for the invasion of the country [52]. Political scandals such as this one could reduce trust in governments and institutions and foster conspiracy theories even in areas that are unrelated to scandals [53].…”
Section: Pleas Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A striking example would be the concatenation of events that led to the Iraq War in 2003. In particular, the claim that the Iraqi regime possessed large numbers of weapons of mass destruction (which later proved to be false [51]) has been widely regarded as a pretextual justi cation for the invasion of the country [52]. Political scandals such as this one could reduce trust in governments and institutions and foster conspiracy theories even in areas that are unrelated to scandals [53].…”
Section: Pleas Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Iraqi government was immediately portrayed as a threat to the international community. The United States asserted a close connection between this regime and global terrorism, emphasizing the need to protect its population and democratic system (Danju et al, 2013). Claims of Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) formed a central premise for invasion, yet these assertions have been debunked, and evidence suggests that the Bush Administration considered inflated, inaccurate claims while aware that Iraq posed no immediate threat to the USA (Cirincione et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%