2020
DOI: 10.5222/head.2020.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reasons for Nurses not to Use Ventrogluteal Region in Intramuscular Injection Administration

Abstract: Aim: While it is recommended that the ventrogluteal (VG) region is safer for intramuscular (IM) injection administration, we have observed that nurses mainly prefer the dorsogluteal (DG) region. Accordingly, the present study was carried out to examine the reasons for the nurses not to prefer the VG region in IM injection administrations. Material and Method: This descriptive study comprised 100 nurses working in a university hospital in the Konya province between June and July 2018. A questionnaire form was u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meneses & Marques argued in 2007 that the V method does not always maintain a proportional relationship between the size of the professional's hand and the patient's injection site, which could lead to inaccurate injection. There is a large amount of literature that discusses the causes behind the limited use of the VS, but the most influential seem to be the insufficient knowledge and training and the consequential lack of confidence and familiarity with its anatomical landmarks (Su & Bekmezci, 2020). Some authors state that the problem is not that there is a failure in transferring the research results to clinical settings, but rather a lack of strong empirical evidence due to the shortage of rigorous designs, and studies that allow the proportional evaluation of adverse effects in both sites of injection (Brown et al, 2015;Gillespie & Toner, 2013).…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meneses & Marques argued in 2007 that the V method does not always maintain a proportional relationship between the size of the professional's hand and the patient's injection site, which could lead to inaccurate injection. There is a large amount of literature that discusses the causes behind the limited use of the VS, but the most influential seem to be the insufficient knowledge and training and the consequential lack of confidence and familiarity with its anatomical landmarks (Su & Bekmezci, 2020). Some authors state that the problem is not that there is a failure in transferring the research results to clinical settings, but rather a lack of strong empirical evidence due to the shortage of rigorous designs, and studies that allow the proportional evaluation of adverse effects in both sites of injection (Brown et al, 2015;Gillespie & Toner, 2013).…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meneses & Marques argued in 2007 that the V method does not always maintain a proportional relationship between the size of the professional's hand and the patient's injection site, which could lead to inaccurate injection. There is a large amount of literature that discusses the causes behind the limited use of the VS, but the most influential seem to be the insufficient knowledge and training and the consequential lack of confidence and familiarity with its anatomical landmarks (Su & Bekmezci, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are five different regions where IM injection can be performed (Berman et al, 2016; Potter et al, 2020). Selection of the appropriate one of these regions depends on many factors, such as age, current diseases, absorption rate and interaction of the desired drug (Su & Bekmezci, 2020). Failure to determine the correct site may cause injection into subcutaneous tissue and nerve damage (Nakajima et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are worried about administering injections into the VG site because they have never used it before. Patients do not agree to a VG site injection because they have never had it before (Gülnar & Çalışkan, 2014;Tuğrul & Denat, 2014;Doğu, 2016;McGee, 2017;Su & Bekmezci, 2020;Wynaden et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%