The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reconstruction of Prestige Patterns in Language History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But can we consider the linguistic prestige sufficient to explain the massive transformations ongoing over the last generations? According to recent studies (Sairio and Palander-Collin 2012), the phenomena of language change or language accommodation to other people's communicative behaviour are often triggered by the dynamics of social prestige. The latter, as we know, is not a stable attribute and can be lost or acquired over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But can we consider the linguistic prestige sufficient to explain the massive transformations ongoing over the last generations? According to recent studies (Sairio and Palander-Collin 2012), the phenomena of language change or language accommodation to other people's communicative behaviour are often triggered by the dynamics of social prestige. The latter, as we know, is not a stable attribute and can be lost or acquired over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The front page and information about r/Italia Source: https://reddit.com/r/italia French, which was historically used in royal culture that developed with colonialism, and Italian, which was used during the Renaissance, make both of them languages of a high prestige internationally (Kahane in Sairio & Pallander-Collin, 2012). These two languages are often used in naming various products throughout the world, such as clothing, jewelry, property and many others to provide a prestigious value.…”
Section: Symbolic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invariably, the descriptions of 16 th -language managers (teachers and literary critics in particular) in Europe, for example, tended to equate the standard variety with correct speech, and consequently disparaged other dialects, which came to be associated with 'uneducated' and 'incorrect' usage. 5 Yet, the development of a standard language culture, according to Milroy (2007), has made language attitudes be dominated by a standard language ideology and purism in language history and historiography (see Milroy 2001aMilroy , 2007Milroy , 2012Riley 2012;or Langer and Nesse 2012), as well as in the reconstruction of prestige patterns (Sairio and Palander-Collin 2012), so that the history of any language is usually the history of its standard variety. The vernaculars were given a marginal treatment, if any, referring to "a form of language (usually speech) that is held to differ in significant ways from the socially approved prestige or standard language" and therefore not accepted "as the language for official transactions or intellectual endeavors" (Macaulay 2001: 420; see also Macaulay 1973Macaulay , 1997and _____________ 5 A clue to the awareness of a well-established standard, opposed to 'wrongful' habits, is found in the texts of playwrights.…”
Section: Prescriptivism and The Standard Issuementioning
confidence: 99%