2015 Digital Heritage 2015
DOI: 10.1109/digitalheritage.2015.7413845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recording of two late Roman towers, Archaeological Museum, Milan 3D documentation and study using image-based modelling

Abstract: This paper is an analysis of the recording, processing and presentation of the 3D data of two late Roman towers, through mast and zeppelin photography and image based modelling software (ffiM). Comparison is made to traditional and other digital recording methods.Index Tenm-close range aerial photography, image-based 3D modeling (ffiM), late Roman, ortophoto, telescopic mast photography, towers, prospect, zeppelin photography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering previous studies, masts can be classified into two types: (i) light masts which can be supported and moved by one or two operators (Martínez et al, ; Martínez et al, ; Ortiz et al, ) and (ii) robust masts which must be stationed on the ground (Blockley & Morandi, ; Mozas‐Calvache et al, a). The use of light masts implicates a reduced height of the camera (up to 6 m), while the use of robust masts can increase the height up to 10 m. However, the use of robust masts increase the difficulties of movement and as a consequence the efficiency of the survey.…”
Section: Methodology and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering previous studies, masts can be classified into two types: (i) light masts which can be supported and moved by one or two operators (Martínez et al, ; Martínez et al, ; Ortiz et al, ) and (ii) robust masts which must be stationed on the ground (Blockley & Morandi, ; Mozas‐Calvache et al, a). The use of light masts implicates a reduced height of the camera (up to 6 m), while the use of robust masts can increase the height up to 10 m. However, the use of robust masts increase the difficulties of movement and as a consequence the efficiency of the survey.…”
Section: Methodology and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of images needed to cover a zone is incremented with the reduction of the distance to the object. Previously to the development of UASs, some approaches had been implemented in order to lift cameras, such as using balloons (Altan, Celikoyan, Kemper, & Toz, ; Bitelli, Tini, & Vittuari, ; Fotinopoulos, ; Mihajlovic, Mitrovic, Cvijetinovic, & Vojinovic, ; Mozas‐Calvache, Pérez‐García, Cardenal‐Escarcena, Mata‐Castro, & Delgado‐García, b), blimps (Gómez‐Lahoz & González‐Aguilera, ), kites and helikites (Verhoeven, Loenders, Vermeulen, & Docter, ; Verhoeven, Taelman, & Vermeulen, ), paramotors (Faustmann & Palmer, ) and tripods or masts (Blockley & Morandi, ; Georgopoulos, Karras, & Makris, ; Martínez, Ortiz, & Gil, ; Martínez, Ortiz, Gil, & Rego, ; Mozas‐Calvache et al, a; Ortiz, Gil, Martínez, Rego, & Meijide, ). A wider analysis of these techniques was performed by Verhoeven ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the acquisitions on site were made with terrestrial photogrammetry, taking advantage of a custom-built structure consisting of a telescopic mast (Blockley et al, 2015). Some other images were extracted from a video filmed by a drone to document the workings of the hydroelectric plant; the frames of this video, even if done for different purposes, were very useful, once reprocessed, to contextualize the archaeological structures in landscape.…”
Section: S Urvey and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So some alternative procedures, such as the use of wide angle lens (Gómez-Lahoz, González-Aguilera, 2009;Mozas et al, 2012;Martínez et al, 2013;Fiorillo et al, 2016), fisheye lens (Boulianne et al, 1997;Kedzierski, Waczykowski, 2007;Georgantas et al, 2012;Covas et al, 2015;Perfetti et al 2017;Barazzetti et al, 2017b) and 360 degrees cameras (Pérez-Ramos, Robleda-Prieto, 2016;Kossieris et al, 2017;Mandelli et al, 2017;Barazzetti et al, 2017a;Fangi et al, 2018;Cantatore et al 2020;Bertellini et al, 2019) were implemented in order to reduce the quantity of images needed to cover the object. The use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) (Colomina, Molina, 2014;Nex, Remondino, 2014;Campana, 2017) and masts (Georgopoulos, 1999;Mozas-Calvache et al, 2012;Martínez et al 2013;Ortiz et al, 2013;Blockley, Morandi, 2015;Martínez et al, 2015;Pérez et al, 2019;Mozas-Calvache et al, 2019) to lift cameras supposes a useful alternative to photographs acquired from the ground because of the improvement of the coverage of the object (usually on the terrain) and the reduction of the occlusions (e.g. those caused by the presence of vertical walls).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%