2009
DOI: 10.1080/10538710802584601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Recovered Memory Controversy: A Representative Case Study

Abstract: The recovered memory controversy has been an ongoing debate within the mental health profession for the past two decades. Disagreement remains in the field over the veracity of "forgotten" memories of childhood sexual abuse that are recalled or recovered during therapy. At the heart of the controversy are the concepts of repression and dissociation as well as the impact traumatizing events have on the encoding of memory. This article provides an overview of the central factors in the longstanding debate and pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This invites the possibility of factors that may impinge on the reliability of traumatic memories. Bias in recall can occur through: repression (Colangelo, 2009), suggestibility of the individual reinforced through practices such as leading questions and hypnosis (Andrews et al, 1999), the need to rationalize the presence of AVH (Schacter, 2001); and, for clinical patients: delusions (Young et al, 2001) and cognitive deteriorations (Driesen et al, 2008). Although these should be kept in mind when examining the veracity of self-reported trauma and AVH, it should also be noted that research indicates a strong tendency to under- instead of over-report abuse in psychiatric patients (Spataro et al, 2004; Fisher et al, 2011).…”
Section: Trauma and Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This invites the possibility of factors that may impinge on the reliability of traumatic memories. Bias in recall can occur through: repression (Colangelo, 2009), suggestibility of the individual reinforced through practices such as leading questions and hypnosis (Andrews et al, 1999), the need to rationalize the presence of AVH (Schacter, 2001); and, for clinical patients: delusions (Young et al, 2001) and cognitive deteriorations (Driesen et al, 2008). Although these should be kept in mind when examining the veracity of self-reported trauma and AVH, it should also be noted that research indicates a strong tendency to under- instead of over-report abuse in psychiatric patients (Spataro et al, 2004; Fisher et al, 2011).…”
Section: Trauma and Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers must therefore rely on retrospective, adulthood accounts of childhood maltreatment. These designs, however, are vulnerable to contamination from such processes as infantile amnesia (Feldman-Summers & Pope, 1994), depressive reinterpretive biases (Lewinsohn & Rosenbaum, 1987), the need to rationalize mental illness (Schacter, 2001), traumatic amnesia (Freyd, 1994), source confusion (Geraerts & McNally, 2008), and repression (Colangelo, 2009). When the groups under consideration are psychotic and/or highly dissociative, the problem is potentially intensified by clinical factors such as impaired reality testing (Lysaker et al, 2005), cognitive deteriorations (Driesen et al, 2008), and delusion formation (M.…”
Section: Research Evidence For the Dissociative Nature Of Voice Hearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little attention was paid to the possibility that amnesia reports might have reflected ordinary forgetting and/or a failure to encode events. Colangelo (2009), for instance, presented a detailed case of a 23-year-old patient who recovered memories of child sexual abuse during therapy. The author explained this patient’s amnesia report in terms of repression and dissociation but did not consider that it might instead have been an instance of normal forgetting, a failure to properly encode the abuse, or simply a voluntarily decision to not disclose the experience (e.g., because of feeling ashamed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%