2016
DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recovery paradigm and distress conceptualized as personality disorder: Lack of evidence does not equate to a lack of importance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptual frameworks of personal recovery have synthesised the stages across the transtheoretical model of change, and processes into the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment) [4]. The application of personal recovery to individuals with BPD requires further exploration [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual frameworks of personal recovery have synthesised the stages across the transtheoretical model of change, and processes into the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment) [4]. The application of personal recovery to individuals with BPD requires further exploration [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are these obvious candidate outcomes for clinicians but they also represent recovery-oriented goals [1], a current focus in the public policy of many jurisdictions [2]. This perspective is of particular importance to those treating patients with personality disorder (PD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD), both of which are often lifelong conditions associated with high levels of impairment [3, 4]. AUD and PD pose similar challenges for clinicians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%