Background
Chest tubes are routinely inserted after major thoracic surgery procedures and usually two drainages are placed. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Smart Drain Coaxial drainage compared with two standard chest tubes in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.
Methods
Ninety-eight patients (57 males and 41 females, mean age 68.3 ± 7.4 years) with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary lobectomy were randomized in two groups: 50 patients received one upper 28 Fr and one lower 32 Fr standard chest tube (ST group) and 48 patients received one 28 Fr Smart Drain Coaxial chest tube (CT group). Hospitalization, quantity of fluid output, air leaks, chest radiograph findings, pain control and costs were assessed.
Results
We performed 33 right upper lobectomies (17 ST, 16 CT), 25 right lower (15 ST, 10 CT), 20 left upper (8 ST, 12 CT) and 19 left lower (10 ST, 9 CT). The CT group showed a significantly shorter hospitalization (7.3 vs 6.1 days, p = 0.03), a significantly lower pain in postoperative day 1 (p = 0.015) and a lower use of analgesic drugs (p = 0.05). Pleural effusion drainage was lower in CT group both in first postoperative day (464 ± 143 ml vs 408 ± 141 ml, p = 0.05) and average of first three days (374 ± 96 ml vs 324 ± 95 ml, p = 0.01). No differences in terms of fluid retention, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema and complications after chest tubes removal were found.
Conclusion
Smart Drain Coaxial chest tube seems an effective option after pulmonary lobectomy. The CT group showed lower hospitalization and use of analgesic drugs and thus a reduction of costs.