Proceedings of Cosmic Radiation Fields: Sources in the Early Universe — PoS(CRF 2010) 2011
DOI: 10.22323/1.121.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Redshift Evolution of LCDM Halo Parameters

Abstract: We study the mass and redshift dependence of the concentration parameter in Nbody simulations spanning masses from 10 10 h −1 M ⊙ to 10 15 h −1 M ⊙ and redshifts from 0 to 2. We present a series of fitting formulas that accurately describe the time evolution of the concentration-mass relation since z=2. Using arguments based on the spherical collapse model we study the behaviour of the scale length of the density profile during the assembly history of haloes, obtaining physical insights on the origin of the ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure minimizes effects of fluctuations and gives the median halo concentration for a given mass. Muñoz-Cuartas et al (2010) applied our method to their simulations and reproduced results of direct density profile fitting. Prada et al (2011) state that this method recovers results of halo concentrations c(M ) in MS-I (Neto et al 2007) with deviations of less than 5 percent over the whole range of masses in the simulation.…”
Section: Halo Mass and Concentration Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This procedure minimizes effects of fluctuations and gives the median halo concentration for a given mass. Muñoz-Cuartas et al (2010) applied our method to their simulations and reproduced results of direct density profile fitting. Prada et al (2011) state that this method recovers results of halo concentrations c(M ) in MS-I (Neto et al 2007) with deviations of less than 5 percent over the whole range of masses in the simulation.…”
Section: Halo Mass and Concentration Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[19], with subhalo-to-subhalo variations modeled by a lognormal distribution with a dispersion of σ c = 0.24 [21].…”
Section: Dark Matter Subhalos In the Milky Waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we will show, the precise value of this threshold does not significantly impact Fermi's sensitivity to dark matter annihilations in subhalos, as the constraints are dominated by the observed number of very bright sources. In generating this figure, we have adopted central values for the halo concentration [19], thus neglecting the impact of halo-to-halo variations.…”
Section: Dark Matter Subhalos In the Milky Waymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the concentration of a halo of a given mass and at a given redshift, c(z, M ), we use the model of Bullock et al [26] (alternatively, using the mass-concentration relationship of Ref. [27] modifies our results only slightly). We also account for halo-tohalo variations in concentration, which are taken to follow a log-normal distribution with ∆(log 10 c) = 0.2 [28].…”
Section: The Contribution From Dark Matter Annihilations To the Ementioning
confidence: 99%