2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Redshift Evolution of the Mean Temperature, Pressure, and Entropy Profiles in 80 SPT-Selected Galaxy Clusters

Abstract: We present the results of an X-ray analysis of 80 galaxy clusters selected in the 2500 deg 2 South Pole Telescope survey and observed with the Chandra X-ray Observatory. We divide the full sample into subsamples of ∼20 clusters based on redshift and central density, performing a joint X-ray spectral fit to all clusters in a subsample simultaneously, assuming self-similarity of the temperature profile. This approach allows us to constrain the shape of the temperature profile over 0 < r < 1.5R 500 , which would … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
102
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
31
102
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Azimuthally-averaged radial profiles of thermal pressure in galaxy clusters identified in our hydrodynamical simulations follow the so-called "universe pressure profile" (Arnaud et al 2010a). The stacked pressure profiles of galaxy-cluster-size halos in our simulation are in good agreement with the stacked pressure profiles inferred from the tSZ data on galaxy clusters detected by Planck (Planck Collaboration et al 2013a) and South Pole Telescope (SPT) (McDonald et al 2014). However, such comparisons allow only a statistical comparison of the averaged profiles.…”
Section: Comasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Azimuthally-averaged radial profiles of thermal pressure in galaxy clusters identified in our hydrodynamical simulations follow the so-called "universe pressure profile" (Arnaud et al 2010a). The stacked pressure profiles of galaxy-cluster-size halos in our simulation are in good agreement with the stacked pressure profiles inferred from the tSZ data on galaxy clusters detected by Planck (Planck Collaboration et al 2013a) and South Pole Telescope (SPT) (McDonald et al 2014). However, such comparisons allow only a statistical comparison of the averaged profiles.…”
Section: Comasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Given that we only have ∼2000 X-ray counts per cluster, modeling the central entropy (e.g., Cavagnolo et al 2009) or estimating the spectroscopically derived cooling rate (e.g., Voigt & Fabian 2004) is not feasible. Instead, we compute spectroscopic quantities (bolometric luminosity, temperature) from a circular aperture with a radius of 0.075 R 500 (where R 500 was derived based on the Y X -M 500 relation of Vikhlinin et al 2009), which should roughly correspond to the deprojected core temperature (see e.g., McDonald et al 2014a). X-ray spectra extracted from this aperture are modeled with a photometric absorption (PHABS) and plasma (APEC) model, allowing the temperature, metallicity, and normalization of the plasma model to vary.…”
Section: X-ray Analysis: Central Entropy and Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss the effects of this choice in later sections. For a more detailed description of our X-ray analysis techniques, we direct the reader to McDonald et al (2013bMcDonald et al ( , 2014a.…”
Section: = -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition we notice that our error bars are model dependent and do not reflect the full uncertainty of the data. The evolution of the pressure profile with redshift has been statistically tested recently using a Chandra X-ray analysis of 80 SPT clusters (McDonald et al 2014) with a highest bin at a mean redshift z = 0.82. They find no significant evolution, apart from the cluster's cores, and agree with a standard redshift evolution of the pressure distribution among clusters.…”
Section: J12269+3332 and The Tsz-mass Scaling Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%