1975
DOI: 10.9746/sicetr1965.11.556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Redundancy of Feedback Gain Matrix and the Derivation of Low Feedback Gain Matrix in Pole Assignmet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering z.o.h. with an imperfect dead-time compensator using 1 st order Pade approximation [9] and a damping tuning to double real poles which can be assigned by a dual regulator using a pole assignment method [12], the overshoot in the reference step response is lager than one in OCR and in CAR.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering z.o.h. with an imperfect dead-time compensator using 1 st order Pade approximation [9] and a damping tuning to double real poles which can be assigned by a dual regulator using a pole assignment method [12], the overshoot in the reference step response is lager than one in OCR and in CAR.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a well-known problem, and the pole placement methods have been extensively discussed in the literature [1] [2] [3] [4]. In standard pole placement methods, a state space model is assumed to be given by a system identification technique using data from past experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, parametrization of K was researched. It is often said that parametrization of K was developed by Fahmy and O'Reilley 121 and Roppenecker 131, but before them Hikita et al [4] refered to parametrization in their own paper. It is an essential problem to judge what obective function should be considered as optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an essential problem to judge what obective function should be considered as optimal. Hikita et al [4] considered that optimal K must be of lowest gain, and presented the method to obtain K with minimum value of k:j. The value of xi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation