The Reflective Model of Triadic Supervision: Defining an Emerging Modality

Stinchfield, Tracy A.; Hill, Nicole R.; Kleist, David M.

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2007.tb00023.x

Cited by 35 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, Stinchfield, Hill, and Kleist (2007) outlined an adaptation of the reflecting team model for triadic supervision, which grew out of literature concerning reflective processes in family therapy. Their article reported initial findings arising from a qualitative inquiry about process and experience with the reflective model of triadic supervision and called for research to determine the efficacy and utility of this approach.…”

Section: Current Literature and Significance Of The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Systemic Processes in Triadic Supervision

Oliver

Nelson

Ybañez

2010

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During a four-year research project that grew out of their teaching and supervision, three counselor educators used a constructivist grounded theory approach to address a gap in the literature on triadic supervision. The authors collaborated with 2 research assistants and 28 research participants to examine triadic supervision through analysis of individual and focus group interviews, observation of videotapes of triadic supervision, and ongoing discussions. Analysis and interpretive theorizing resulted in the identification of the following basic processes present in triadic supervision: systemic engagement, synergy, recursiveness, presence of the supervisor, and community. Description of each process, considerations about use of triadic supervision, and implications for teaching and practice are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Current Literature and Significance Of The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Systemic Processes in Triadic Supervision

Oliver

Nelson

Ybañez

2010

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have stressed the importance of matching supervisees in triadic supervision (Hein et al, 2011;Stinchfield et al, 2007), but the present findings make clear that supervisee incompatibility can manifest in a wide variety of ways that supervisors may not always be able to anticipate. Similarly, the participants expressed a wide variety of perspectives on the type of compatibility that is most critical to consider when matching supervisees.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

“…In triadic supervision, one supervisor works simultaneously with two supervisees during supervision sessions. Since its approval, many aspects of triadic supervision have been investigated, either quantitatively (Newgent, Davis, & Farley, 2005) or qualitatively (Hein & Lawson, 2008Lawson, Hein, & Getz, 2009;Lawson, Hein, & Stuart, 2009;Lawson, Hein, & Stuart, 2010;Stinchfield, Hill, & Kleist, 2007). An important facet of triadic supervision that has only recently received systematic research attention, however, is supervisee incompatibility.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supervisee Incompatibility and Its Influence on Supervisee and Supervisor Outcomes in Triadic Supervision: An Investigation of Supervisors' Perspectives

Hein

Lawson

Rodriguez

2013

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A qualitative study was conducted to examine supervisors' experiences of the outcomes for themselves and their supervisees when supervisee incompatibility was present in triadic supervision. In-depth, open-ended interviews were conducted with nine supervisors in one counselor education program. A whole-text analysis revealed that participants varied in the supervisee characteristics that they considered most important to address during supervisee matching. Supervisee incompatibility also resulted in a variety of positive and negative outcomes for both the supervisees and the supervisor.

show abstract

“…The reflective model of triadic supervision reflects on the therapeutic alliance between supervisor, supervisee, and client (Stinchfield, Hill & Kleist, 2007). The working alliance model, based in psychoanalytical theory, uses the relationship between supervisor and supervisee to share goals, accomplish tasks, and build relational bonds (Bardin, 1979).…”

Section: Models Of Supervisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

UNBC clinic of care: clinic manual and marketing plan

James¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this project was to develop two documents that will become the framework for the proposed establishment of a clinic of counselling that would meet the training needs of graduate students in the University of Northern British Columbia's (UNBC), Masters of Education, Counselling Specialization program, and the needs of community members of Prince George. The two documents include a marketing plan for the implementation of the proposed clinic and a manual for the operation of the clinic.ii The clinic manual is a document that forms the foundation on which to build a safe, ethical, professional, and organized clinic through detailed clinic policies and procedures.This manual is comprehensive enough to give people all the required information needed to run the clinic. The marketing plan provides those who work on implementation a framework for how to deliver competent services, address financial needs, raise funds, and do risk an assessment. ABSTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OFT ABLES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

show abstract

The Reflective Model of Triadic Supervision: Defining an Emerging Modality

Cited by 35 publications

References 17 publications

Systemic Processes in Triadic Supervision

Systemic Processes in Triadic Supervision

Supervisee Incompatibility and Its Influence on Supervisee and Supervisor Outcomes in Triadic Supervision: An Investigation of Supervisors' Perspectives

UNBC clinic of care: clinic manual and marketing plan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About