1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46473-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Regime Method: A New Multicriteria Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insisting on a single valued objective score leads to inevitable aggregation of disparate quantities, requiring assumptions that many decision makers find intolerable and leading to inaccurate results. RBOs have the flexibility to incorporate established methods from the field of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) (Belton and Stewart 2001;Figuera et al 2005) and are well poised to borrow strategies from MCDA methods based on pairwise comparisons, such as Regime (Hinloopen et al 1983) or the multiplicative analytic hierarchy process (Lootsma 1993). In addition, Loomes and Sugden (1982) propose a model of regret and rejoice that is based on examining two alternatives at a time.…”
Section: Rule-based Objectives (Rbos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insisting on a single valued objective score leads to inevitable aggregation of disparate quantities, requiring assumptions that many decision makers find intolerable and leading to inaccurate results. RBOs have the flexibility to incorporate established methods from the field of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) (Belton and Stewart 2001;Figuera et al 2005) and are well poised to borrow strategies from MCDA methods based on pairwise comparisons, such as Regime (Hinloopen et al 1983) or the multiplicative analytic hierarchy process (Lootsma 1993). In addition, Loomes and Sugden (1982) propose a model of regret and rejoice that is based on examining two alternatives at a time.…”
Section: Rule-based Objectives (Rbos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical efficiency of outsourcing can be measured by parametric and non-parametric evaluation methods, which permit simultaneous comparison of the inputs and outputs of an outsourcing and in-house service production and produce concise indicators of efficiency. Considering the nature of the public organisations involved in our analysis, we decided to use a particular non-parametric method, the Method of best values of indicators (MBVI), which is encountering growing consensus as a powerful tool to measure public organisations productivity because it allows the heterogeneity of delivered outputs to be taken into account [18,19,20].…”
Section: Outsourcing In Public Organizations: Czech Republic: Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) / Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can be grouped as different criteria [6,18,19], e.g. :  methods based on the outranking relation -ELECTRE methods [20,21], PROMETHEE methods [22,23], ORESTE [24], REGIME [25], TACTIC [26], NAIADE [27], MELCHIOR [28], etc. ;  methods based on the utility function -AHP [29,30], ANP [31], DEMATEL [2], MAUT, REMBRANDT, MACBETH [1], SMART [32], UTA [33], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%