2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1507-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: A Review of the Performance of Two Key Non-survey Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a detailed discussion of these two approaches, seeFlegg and Tohmo (2018). 5 See Bonfiglio and Chelli (2008, table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a detailed discussion of these two approaches, seeFlegg and Tohmo (2018). 5 See Bonfiglio and Chelli (2008, table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Flegg and Tohmo (2018a) point out, it should only be used in conjunction with national IO tables where the inter-industry transactions exclude imports (type B tables). In contrast, where the focus is on the overall supply of commodities, Kronenberg's Cross-Hauling Adjusted Regionalization Method (CHARM) can be employed (Többen and Kronenberg, 2015;Flegg and Tohmo, 2018b). CHARM requires type A tables, those where imports have been incorporated into the national transactions table.…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Lq-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation of this phenomenon is that South Korean regions typically import a substantially higher proportion of their inputs from other domestic regions than do Finnish regions. Consequently, to adjust for this disparity in import propensities, a higher value of δ is required in South Korea than in Finland (Flegg and Tohmo, 2018b).…”
Section: Implementing the New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides testing the performance of SDR and the LQ as RPC estimates, we also do so for an approach that follow FLQ techniques. For this, we consider (Flegg & Tohmo, 2013, 2018): ρ˙icSLQic×λ*, where ρ˙ic denotes an estimate of the actual RPC ()ρic for industry i in country c within the EU: SLQi={()qic/q·c/()qi·/q··,0.5emif[]()qic/q·c/()qi·/q··1.016.5em,0.5emif[]()qic/q·c/()qi·/q··>1.0, and λ*normalδ0.25emlog2()1+e·c/e··. …”
Section: Rpc Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flegg, Webber, and Elliott (1995), Flegg and Tohmo (2013, 2016, 2018, 2019), Flegg, Mastronardi, and Romero (2016), Jahn (2017), and Kowalewksi (2015) have examined slightly more complex parametric transforms of LQs to estimate regional supply percentages. Like LQ approaches, when applied row‐wise to a region's technology matrix, these so‐called “FLQs” estimate a region's direct requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%