2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regrowth of phytoplankton cultures after UV disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the BWMC-Guideline 8, the evaluation of the treatment efficacy is based on the determination of living organisms by widely accepted standard methods (Gollasch et al 2012;Cullen and MacIntyre 2016), such as vital fluorescence stains detected using flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy, ATP content, photosynthetic activity, or motility assessment (Hessen et al 1997;Sato et al 2004;Gavand et al 2007;Gallo-Villanueva et al 2011;Steinberg et al 2011Steinberg et al , 2012Fan et al 2013;Martínez et al 2013;Stehouwer et al 2013;Adams et al 2014;First and Drake 2014;Tilney et al 2014;Feng et al 2015;Gollasch et al 2015;Olsen et al 2015;van Slooten et al 2015;Wright et al 2015). However, the application of UV treatment does not cause immediate changes in the concentration of living organisms, although their growth curves become different over the time, depending on the applied UV dose (Tao et al 2010;Gorokhova et al 2012;Martínez et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the BWMC-Guideline 8, the evaluation of the treatment efficacy is based on the determination of living organisms by widely accepted standard methods (Gollasch et al 2012;Cullen and MacIntyre 2016), such as vital fluorescence stains detected using flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy, ATP content, photosynthetic activity, or motility assessment (Hessen et al 1997;Sato et al 2004;Gavand et al 2007;Gallo-Villanueva et al 2011;Steinberg et al 2011Steinberg et al , 2012Fan et al 2013;Martínez et al 2013;Stehouwer et al 2013;Adams et al 2014;First and Drake 2014;Tilney et al 2014;Feng et al 2015;Gollasch et al 2015;Olsen et al 2015;van Slooten et al 2015;Wright et al 2015). However, the application of UV treatment does not cause immediate changes in the concentration of living organisms, although their growth curves become different over the time, depending on the applied UV dose (Tao et al 2010;Gorokhova et al 2012;Martínez et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV radiation is a clean technology that exhibits high efficiency for bacteria inactivation. However, ballast water treatment by UV radiation or photocatalysis alone during ballasting maybe requested to be secondary treated during deballasting, owing to the reactivation and multiplication of microorganisms in ballast tank (Martinez et al 2013). The results in Figure 3 implied that application of UV/Ag-TiO 2 and ozonation simultaneously could overcome the drawbacks of sole UV radiation.…”
Section: Toxicity Of Effluentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, combined UV and nano-TiO 2 photocatalysis technology has caught much sight to inhibit the photoreactivation and dark repair of bacteria (Shang et al 2009 ). Under UV irradiation, nano-TiO 2 catalyst can generate a large number of reactive oxygenated species, which are highly effective to deconstruct cellular structure, accelerate the death of microorganisms, and prevent the regeneration of harmful microorganisms in the ballast water (Martínez et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%