2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11118-021-09945-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Regularity Problem for Uniformly Elliptic Operators in Weighted Spaces

Abstract: This paper studies the regularity problem for block uniformly elliptic operators in divergence form with complex bounded measurable coefficients. We consider the case where the boundary data belongs to Lebesgue spaces with weights in the Muckenhoupt classes. Our results generalize those of S. Mayboroda (and those of P. Auscher and S. Stahlhut employing the first order method) who considered the unweighted case. To obtain our main results we use the weighted Hardy space theory associated with elliptic operators… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When w ≡ 1 (that is, we are working with the class of uniformly -or non-degenerate-elliptic operators) and v ≡ 1 then, clearly, r w = 1, W w v max{r w , q − (L w )}, q + (L w ) = (q − (L w ), q + (L w )) = Ø, and our result gives (1.10) in the range max 1, nq − (Lw) n+q − (Lw) , q + (L w ) , hence we fully recover [29,Theorem 4.1]. If we still assume that w ≡ 1 and we let v ∈ A ∞ (w) = A ∞ (dx), then our assumption (1.9) agrees with that in [11,Theorem 1.10] and the range of p's here is slightly worse than the one in that result (the lower end-point in [11,Theorem 1.10] has been pushed down using an extra technical argument that we have chosen not to follow here).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When w ≡ 1 (that is, we are working with the class of uniformly -or non-degenerate-elliptic operators) and v ≡ 1 then, clearly, r w = 1, W w v max{r w , q − (L w )}, q + (L w ) = (q − (L w ), q + (L w )) = Ø, and our result gives (1.10) in the range max 1, nq − (Lw) n+q − (Lw) , q + (L w ) , hence we fully recover [29,Theorem 4.1]. If we still assume that w ≡ 1 and we let v ∈ A ∞ (w) = A ∞ (dx), then our assumption (1.9) agrees with that in [11,Theorem 1.10] and the range of p's here is slightly worse than the one in that result (the lower end-point in [11,Theorem 1.10] has been pushed down using an extra technical argument that we have chosen not to follow here).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…This amounted to control non-tangentially the full gradient of the solution given by the Poisson semigroup in terms of the gradient of the boundary datum. In turn, using the weighted Hardy space theory developed in [27,28,30], the solvability of the regularity problem in the block case for data in Lebesgue spaces with Muckenhoupt weights has been recently studied in [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we can take a Ẇ1,2convergent atomic decomposition u = i λ i m i as in Proposition 8. 31. By the solution of the Kato problem we have L 2 -convergence of…”
Section: Identification Of Adapted Hardy Spacesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We point out that Step V in the proof of [74,Thm. 4.1] has a flaw that can be fixed (personal communication of S. Hofmann) or treated differently, see the argument in [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%