The Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) Position on the Application of Wheelchairs, Seating Systems, and Secondary Supports for Positioning Versus Restraint

Babinec, Michael; Cole, Elizabeth; Crane, Barbara; Dahling, Steven; Freney, Delia; Jungbluth-Jermyn, Barbara; Lange, Michelle L.; Pau-Lee, Yunn Yi; Olson, Donald N.; Pedersen, Jessica Presperin; Potter, C. Stanley; Savage, David; Shea, M. Tracie

doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1113802

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, in DMD, a high risk of pressure injuries, which increases with age, has been reported [9,11]. The type of cushion, backrest, seating components such as posterior or lateral supports or belts, as well as the WC size and parameters can either improve sitting tolerance and social participation [18,19] or can actually have a negative impact on the person's life [20,21]. Three interventional studies have been published on the effects of wheelchair seating, 2 in DMD [22,23] and 1 in SMA II [24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of wheelchair seating criteria in adults with neuromuscular diseases: A Delphi study

Dupitier,

Voisin,

Stalens

et al. 2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Adults with neuromuscular diseases like spinal muscular atrophy or Duchenne muscular dystrophy require full-time use of a wheelchair (WC) and perform all activities of daily living in a sitting position. Optimal configuration of the WC and seating system is essential to maintain the health and quality of life of users. However, few recommendations for configuration exist. The aim of this study was to identify and select 10 WC seating criteria that ensure an optimal sitting posture for health and quality of life. Methods A four round Delphi method was used to collect the opinions of WC users and health professionals (HP), separately. First, the HP were asked if they believed that different criteria would apply to each disease. Then the HP and SMA II and DMD WC user experts responded to electronic surveys in 4 rounds. Results Overall, 74 experts took part: 31 HP, 21 WC users with SMA II and 22 WC users with DMD. In total, 52% of HP believed that different criteria would apply to each disease. Ten criteria were identified by the HP for SMA II and 10 for DMD. Of the 40 criteria selected, 30 (75%) were common to each panel. Six topics were similar across panels: comfort, access to the joystick, prevention of pain, stability, pressure management and power seat functions. However, power seat functions did not reach consensus between HP and WC users (30–33% of agreement for HP and 93–100% for the WC user panels, p < 0.001). Conclusion Adults with SMA II and DMD had similar WC seating needs. Therefore, the same recommendations can be applied to these groups. Further research is necessary to understand the impact of cost on the prescription of power seat functions by health professionals.

show abstract