Leo VI and the Transformation of Byzantine Christian Identity
DOI: 10.1017/9781107281967.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reign of Leo VI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…122 Th e Byzantine emperor was viewed as an Old Testament David redivivus , a priest in the order of Melchizedek , and therefore the possessor of acute spiritual power. 123 However, Dagron notes, 'an emperor was nothing if he was not everything, and in particular if he was not the providential mediator between his people and God.' 124 Th e distinctively Byzantine problem of 'the quasi-episcopal sacrality of a sovereign ' has direct infl uence on the authority of an innovative military manual, as well as the Byzantine embrace of the self-image propagated by Leo VI and his successors.…”
Section: у д р ы й и е г о ц а р с т в о в а н і е в ъ ц е р к о в н mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 Th e Byzantine emperor was viewed as an Old Testament David redivivus , a priest in the order of Melchizedek , and therefore the possessor of acute spiritual power. 123 However, Dagron notes, 'an emperor was nothing if he was not everything, and in particular if he was not the providential mediator between his people and God.' 124 Th e distinctively Byzantine problem of 'the quasi-episcopal sacrality of a sovereign ' has direct infl uence on the authority of an innovative military manual, as well as the Byzantine embrace of the self-image propagated by Leo VI and his successors.…”
Section: у д р ы й и е г о ц а р с т в о в а н і е в ъ ц е р к о в н mentioning
confidence: 99%