2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between accretion rate and jet power in early-type galaxies with thermally unstable hot atmospheres

Abstract: We use Chandra X-ray data and Very Large Array radio observations for a sample of 20 nearby, massive, X-ray bright, early-type galaxies to investigate the relation between the Bondi accretion rates and the mechanical jet powers. We find a strong correlation ($\rho = 0.96^{+0.03}_{-0.09}$; BF10 > 100) between the Bondi accretion power, PBondi, and the mechanical jet power, Pjet, for a subsample of 14 galaxies, which also host cool Hα+[N ii] line emitting gas and thus likely have thermally unstable atmosp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, accretion density profiles for hot X-ray emitting gas using Chandra observations of SMBHs for a large sample of 20 nearby galaxies are reported by Plšek et al (2022), all of which show clearly falling radial profiles beyond the Bondi radius, with power-law slopes close to the expectations of the new model presented here. Figure 4 shows the inferred volumetric electron density profiles from Plšek et al (2022) for NGC 1316 and NGC 4649, points with error bars, together with R −3/2 fits to the observed profiles. In all cases for the innermost points, the reported relative radial errors are 100%, for which reason the innermost points have been ignored in the fits.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, accretion density profiles for hot X-ray emitting gas using Chandra observations of SMBHs for a large sample of 20 nearby galaxies are reported by Plšek et al (2022), all of which show clearly falling radial profiles beyond the Bondi radius, with power-law slopes close to the expectations of the new model presented here. Figure 4 shows the inferred volumetric electron density profiles from Plšek et al (2022) for NGC 1316 and NGC 4649, points with error bars, together with R −3/2 fits to the observed profiles. In all cases for the innermost points, the reported relative radial errors are 100%, for which reason the innermost points have been ignored in the fits.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In Section 2, we present a new exact analytic spherically symmetric accretion model for γ = 5/3, explore some of its scalings and implications, and present a comparison to the corresponding Bondi model and to a couple of observed accretion density profiles in nearby X-ray emitting elliptical galaxies from the sample of Plšek et al (2022). Our new solution is then used in Section 3 as the basis for a first-order perturbative analysis preserving axial symmetry, but to first order on departures from sphericity with the polar angle and considering the inclusion of angular momentum, also to first order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these jets impact a relatively small fraction of the accreting gas. While a large number of simulations have been able to explore self-regulation of AGN in cluster environments (Cattaneo & Teyssier 2007;Sijacki et al 2007;Dubois et al 2010;Gaspari et al 2012;Li & Bryan 2014;Prasad et al 2015;Yang & Reynolds 2016;Bourne & Sijacki 2017), these simulations lack the dynamic range to study black hole feeding at scales below 𝑅 B .…”
Section: Mechanical Feedback On the Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including all sectors at the innermost "Bondi radius" point. While this work was in preparation, another measurement of 𝑀 B was performed by Plšek et al (2022) which leveraged the data from our new campaign, presented here and publicly available. They found 𝑀 B = 2.4 +1.9 −1.5 × 10 −3 𝑀 yr −1 , again using all sectors.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%