1958
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1958.sp001319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation Between Alveolar Oxygen Pressure and the Respiratory Response to Carbon Dioxide in Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
110
2
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
110
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, the increment of VE responding to CO2 increased as PETo 2 decreased (Table 2), as was reported by LLOYD et al (1958) and EDELMAN et al (1973). On the other hand, the respiratory rates were not significantly changed in the PETo2 range of 40 to 80 mmHg, so the increment in VT was seen as the main reason for the augmented VE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In our experiments, the increment of VE responding to CO2 increased as PETo 2 decreased (Table 2), as was reported by LLOYD et al (1958) and EDELMAN et al (1973). On the other hand, the respiratory rates were not significantly changed in the PETo2 range of 40 to 80 mmHg, so the increment in VT was seen as the main reason for the augmented VE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The work of Lloyd et al (1958) suggests that there is little change in slope of the V/Pco, line with rising Po, at levels of alveolar Po, above 150 mm Hg. On the other hand, pure oxygen may increase ventilation and was therefore avoided in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. For this purpose it is not enough to replot all data on the same co-ordinates, because different subjects have control CO2-response lines with different intercepts on the Pco2 axis (the parameter B of Lloyd, Jukes & Cunningham, 1958, or The result is shown in Fig. 5 (1) Ethamivan data with 3 points excluded and saline data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system LG is then equal to the vector summation of LG O 2 and LG CO 2 , with the contribution to LG of the central CO 2 controller during PB being neglected (25). A further important difference is that the human controller apparently has a relatively fixed apneic threshold for CO 2 (19,30), whereas the lamb and several other species do not (12,28). It seems likely that these fundamental differences are the reason hypoxia normally precipitates PB in sleeping humans (6,27), whereas it has never been reported to do so in the lamb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%