2000
DOI: 10.1067/mje.2000.107253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between mitral annulus motion and ejection fraction: A nonlinear function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MA area change from MA area at ED ranged from a minimum value of Ϫ4.4Ϯ6.1% to a maximum value of 25.4Ϯ12.7%. As expected, the MA motion curve resembled the LV volume curve 2,12 and reached its maximum distance from MA ED position at ES (7.7Ϯ2.8 mm). MA anterior section showed less motion throughout the cardiac cycle than the posterior MA section, with maximum anterior MA displacement (7.4Ϯ2.5 mm) being significantly smaller than the posterior value (8.2Ϯ3.2 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…MA area change from MA area at ED ranged from a minimum value of Ϫ4.4Ϯ6.1% to a maximum value of 25.4Ϯ12.7%. As expected, the MA motion curve resembled the LV volume curve 2,12 and reached its maximum distance from MA ED position at ES (7.7Ϯ2.8 mm). MA anterior section showed less motion throughout the cardiac cycle than the posterior MA section, with maximum anterior MA displacement (7.4Ϯ2.5 mm) being significantly smaller than the posterior value (8.2Ϯ3.2 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…24 25 This correlation is logarithmic rather than linear. 26 Unlike M mode echocardiography, TDi can be used to calculate both the amplitude and the velocity of mitral annular motion and reliably reflects changes in cardiac contractility, ejection fraction, ejection time and pressures, and ''latent'' left ventricular dysfunction. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] TDi has good reproducibility 35 and may identify left ventricular dysfunction before conventional indices are abnormal.…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaling of D and SV with growth or heart size is therefore important to assess (23,24). Because both SV and ET scales differently to body size, the different impact of ET and SV on SЈ may change during developmental growth (14,25,26). ET is determined mainly by HR and inotropic state (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%