1964
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation of recombination to mutational advance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

31
1,681
4
13

Year Published

1976
1976
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,334 publications
(1,729 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
31
1,681
4
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical advantages to outcrossing in facilitating adaptive evolution (Fisher, 1930;Muller, 1932;Hamilton et al, 1990) and in eliminating deleterious mutations (Muller, 1964 ;Felsenstein, 1974 ;Kondrashov, 1988 ;Charlesworth, 1990 ;Gabriel et al, 1993) form enticing hypotheses for male persistence in this species, but other possibilities -namely the notion that malespecific genes and loci that influence X non-disjunction might act as selfish genetic elements -must be excluded before this may be considered definitive. Clearly, dissection of the evolutionary forces responsible for the persistence of males in populations of C. elegans and other androdioecious nematodes remains a topic requiring further inquiry.…”
Section: (I) Experimental Verification Of the Sex Ratio Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical advantages to outcrossing in facilitating adaptive evolution (Fisher, 1930;Muller, 1932;Hamilton et al, 1990) and in eliminating deleterious mutations (Muller, 1964 ;Felsenstein, 1974 ;Kondrashov, 1988 ;Charlesworth, 1990 ;Gabriel et al, 1993) form enticing hypotheses for male persistence in this species, but other possibilities -namely the notion that malespecific genes and loci that influence X non-disjunction might act as selfish genetic elements -must be excluded before this may be considered definitive. Clearly, dissection of the evolutionary forces responsible for the persistence of males in populations of C. elegans and other androdioecious nematodes remains a topic requiring further inquiry.…”
Section: (I) Experimental Verification Of the Sex Ratio Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes can alter the relative length, gene content and chromatin structure of the sex chromosomes. Hence, suppression of homologous recombination plays a key role in the divergence in shape (heteromorphy) that characterises many sex chromosome pairs [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This apparent association between the function of sex determination and suppression of recombination has led to the suggestion that restricted recombination in sex chromosomes evolves due to selection to resolve sexually antagonistic genetic interactions [2,[9][10][11]. This sexual antagonism hypothesis has assumed the status of conventional wisdom, to the extent that, in many recent publications, sexual antagonism is the only hypothesis suggested to account for restricted recombination in sex chromosomes [1,6,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prolonged advantage of multiple heterozygotes could, in some circumstances, lead to the evolution of coadapted gene complexes (Dobzhansky, 1970). A second possibility is that the chromosomal arrangements (standard and inverted) accumulate deleterious recessive mutations because complementation, and the absence of recombination, prevent their selective elimination from the gene pool (Muller, 1964;Charlesworth, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%