1963
DOI: 10.1007/bf01252073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation of turgor pressure to cell volume inNitella with special reference to mechanical properties of the cell wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
44
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kamiya et al (17) showed that when pressure in a cell wall tube of Nitellaflexilis was increased in steps and then decreased with the same steps, the volume changes of the wall ' The values of e found for plants range over 3 orders of magnitude (25). For the giant-celled algae maximum values of e range from 0.06 MPa for Halicystis parvula (13) to 70 MPa for Chara corrallina (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kamiya et al (17) showed that when pressure in a cell wall tube of Nitellaflexilis was increased in steps and then decreased with the same steps, the volume changes of the wall ' The values of e found for plants range over 3 orders of magnitude (25). For the giant-celled algae maximum values of e range from 0.06 MPa for Halicystis parvula (13) to 70 MPa for Chara corrallina (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kamiya et al (17) showed that when pressure in a cell wall tube of Nitellaflexilis was increased in steps and then decreased with the same steps, the volume changes of the wall ' For the giant-celled algae the pressure probe method has generally been used (25). This method measures the apparently instantaneous change in turgor pressure after the cell volume is changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cosgrove (1993) reviewed methods that have been used to gauge these respective aspects of cell wall mechanics, and Schopfer (2006) discussed pitfalls in data interpretation that can result from not appreciating this distinction. Yet, ever since Kamiya et al (1963), it has been clear that plant cell walls exhibit viscoelastic properties like retarded elasticity, and most workers since Probine and Preston (1962) have assumed that these properties should be important to cell growth and/or other aspects of plant cell function that depend on cell wall behavior (Thompson, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that one effect of at is to cause a longitudinal stress a{ which would be subtracted from <?i (10). In the case of the cell, it is therefore possible, on a first approach, to reduce the effect of turgor pressure (P) to a simple tension, the force (F) value of which would be:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%