2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315268798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relational Ethics of Narrative Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were invited to indicate what parts of the draft transcription they wanted to remain, correct or be removed. I read, re‐read, reflected and immersed myself in the stories, considering the thoughts, feelings, ideas and experiences being offered to my research question. Self‐reflexivity through journaling engaged me in the relationship with the participants' stories, enabling me to world travel (Clandinin, Caine, & Lessard, ) into the expansiveness of their subjective experiences. I sought emerging common themes between and within the participants' stories, drawing together the complex dialogic environment of the different audiences: self, client, participant, therapist and researcher. The themes of “knowing ourselves”, “revealing ourselves” and “an external perspective” emerged through my engagement with the following questions: oWhat within the various stages of the research process resonated or created dissonance within me? oWhat specific expressions or phrases from the interviews with the participants captured my attention? oWhat thoughts, feelings and images emerged for me as I sat with these expressions or phrases? oWhat resonated or created dissonance between my own experiences and those of the participants? oWhat did the resonance or dissonance contribute to my thinking about the answers to my research question? …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were invited to indicate what parts of the draft transcription they wanted to remain, correct or be removed. I read, re‐read, reflected and immersed myself in the stories, considering the thoughts, feelings, ideas and experiences being offered to my research question. Self‐reflexivity through journaling engaged me in the relationship with the participants' stories, enabling me to world travel (Clandinin, Caine, & Lessard, ) into the expansiveness of their subjective experiences. I sought emerging common themes between and within the participants' stories, drawing together the complex dialogic environment of the different audiences: self, client, participant, therapist and researcher. The themes of “knowing ourselves”, “revealing ourselves” and “an external perspective” emerged through my engagement with the following questions: oWhat within the various stages of the research process resonated or created dissonance within me? oWhat specific expressions or phrases from the interviews with the participants captured my attention? oWhat thoughts, feelings and images emerged for me as I sat with these expressions or phrases? oWhat resonated or created dissonance between my own experiences and those of the participants? oWhat did the resonance or dissonance contribute to my thinking about the answers to my research question? …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our last conversation, I shared narrative accounts that reflected our conversations and we made decisions about what experiences we would like to share publicly. These decisions are part of the ongoing negotiations with participants and are embedded within relational ethics (Clandinin, Caine, & Lessard, ). As researchers, we hold long‐term relational responsibilities to care for the stories and experiences shared with us by participants.…”
Section: Fieldtext: the Unfolding Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerando a ética relacional da pesquisa narrativa (CLANDININ, et al, 2018), e uma visão de conhecimento como pessoal, construído na experiência, corporificado e narrativo conforme Bruner (1986), Clandinin (2013), Clandinin e Connelly (1995), Clandinin et al (2006) e Mello et al (2016), entendo que por meio de uma pesquisa colaborativa como a pesquisa narrativa, eu poderia pesquisar COM os alunos, em vez de pesquisar OS alunos. Essa perspectiva teórica e metodológica é coerente com meu objeto de estudo, que são as experiências de autoria com tecnologias digitais que vivemos na escola.…”
Section: O Caminho Teórico E Metodológicounclassified
“…Quando entrei em campo de pesquisa na Escola Aquarela em fevereiro de 2014, eu tinha um projeto de doutorado e um foco principal: honrar as histórias que eu e meus alunos viveríamos na escola pública brasileira. Considerando a área da Linguística Aplicada, cujo objeto é a linguagem em uso, decidi trilhar o caminho teórico e metodológico da pesquisa narrativa conforme Clandinin e Connelly (2000, 2015 para investigar um objeto específico: as experiências de autoria vividas pelos alunos do sexto ano nas aulas de língua inglesa e por mim, na época, professora da educação básica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation