2012
DOI: 10.5937/fizkul1202100t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relations between the morphological status, situational efficiency and sport achievement of elite junior basketball teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group of outside players (organizer of the game, shooting guard and small forward) if we compare them with the basketball players from the European junior basketball championship, we see that the basketball players that we had for research have lower values than the players who cover the line 6.75 cm (Jelicic et al, 2002). Also, the morphological structure during the observation was for these players within the team, we assume that these players can play on defense with the opponent during the transition because in contemporary basketball these players are much more athletic, also the body circumference is more visible than other parameters (Jelicic et al, 2002;Abdelkrim et al, 2010;Trninic et al, 2013). Whereas, the group of players who cover the indoor game (power forward and center) according to the results, we see that the players have presented differences in favor of the players from the European junior basketball championship (Trninic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The group of outside players (organizer of the game, shooting guard and small forward) if we compare them with the basketball players from the European junior basketball championship, we see that the basketball players that we had for research have lower values than the players who cover the line 6.75 cm (Jelicic et al, 2002). Also, the morphological structure during the observation was for these players within the team, we assume that these players can play on defense with the opponent during the transition because in contemporary basketball these players are much more athletic, also the body circumference is more visible than other parameters (Jelicic et al, 2002;Abdelkrim et al, 2010;Trninic et al, 2013). Whereas, the group of players who cover the indoor game (power forward and center) according to the results, we see that the players have presented differences in favor of the players from the European junior basketball championship (Trninic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the morphological structure during the observation was for these players within the team, we assume that these players can play on defense with the opponent during the transition because in contemporary basketball these players are much more athletic, also the body circumference is more visible than other parameters (Jelicic et al, 2002;Abdelkrim et al, 2010;Trninic et al, 2013). Whereas, the group of players who cover the indoor game (power forward and center) according to the results, we see that the players have presented differences in favor of the players from the European junior basketball championship (Trninic et al, 2013). We can assume that the length of the skeleton is one of the most important values ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In others authors researches (Hadzic et al, 2016), have had to paper-experiment with title analysis of morphological structure characteristics on new basketball players, in which they extracted the same factor as our research, in which they are determined for the longitudinal skeletal factor. Also the Croatian authors have extracted the same longitudinal skeleton factor (Trninić, Jeličić, & Foretić, 2013). Other morphological latent dimensions are presented by authors (Šišić, Krespi, & Pojskić, 2015) to Bosnian basketball players in which factor was extracted as the volume and body mass factor with 37% of the high correlation variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%