1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(98)00066-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Among Microsomal Enzyme Induction, Liver Weight and Histological Change in Rat Toxicology Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in body weight gains may be due to the combined action of cholinergic and oxidative stress [19,[34][35][36][37] and/or due to the increased degradation of lipids and proteins as a direct effect of organophosphate compound exposure [38]. Moreover, the increase in liver weight could be attributed to the relationship between liver weight increase and various toxicological effects or to the reduction in body weight gain of experimental animals [2,34,36,[39][40][41]. However, co-administration with SAC or VC attenuated the statistical different change of body and relative liver weights in DM-treated animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in body weight gains may be due to the combined action of cholinergic and oxidative stress [19,[34][35][36][37] and/or due to the increased degradation of lipids and proteins as a direct effect of organophosphate compound exposure [38]. Moreover, the increase in liver weight could be attributed to the relationship between liver weight increase and various toxicological effects or to the reduction in body weight gain of experimental animals [2,34,36,[39][40][41]. However, co-administration with SAC or VC attenuated the statistical different change of body and relative liver weights in DM-treated animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances, liver enlargement was not associated with pathological changes, and the liver weights returned to control levels when the conditions causing the liver enlargement were terminated. Based on the results of studies of 11 drug candidate substances, Amacher et al (1998) concluded that liver weight increases of up to 50% with no more than slight elevations in levels of ALT or mild pathological changes should be interpreted as adaptive responses. Ennulat et al (2010) [citing Greaves (2007) and Schulte-Hermann et al (1974)] concluded that the most common histological change associated with liver enzyme induction was hepatocellular hypertrophy.…”
Section: Liver Enlargementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsomal enzyme inducers are known to cause hepatomegaly as an adaptive change without any evidence of liver injury in rats (Amacher et al, 1998 108.2 ± 1.9 108.2 ± 1.7 107.0 ± 1.3 106.8 ± 1.0 106.0 ± 1.7 104.8 ± 0.8 Ca, mg/dL 9.50 ± 0.33 9.68 ± 0.13 9.82 ± 0.16 10.13 ± 0.28** 9.83 ± 0.27 10.02 ± 0.44 IP, mg/dL 7.28 ± 0.70 7.33 ± 0.42 6.90 ± 0.62 7.52 ± 0.52 6.88 ± 0.58 7.13 ± 0.34 Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. *Significantly different from the control group at P < .05 by the Dunnett multiple comparison test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%