2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2021.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between accelerometer-measured sleep and next day ecological momentary assessment symptom report during sport-related concussion recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, compliance with data collection in prospective studies that have used EMAs has been reported as high [52], and that EMAs can reduce recall bias through using real-time data collection [23,34,47]. While participant responses using EMAs are considered to be more reliable than retrospective studies [22,31,48], several study authors did identify as a potential barrier the reliability of information from participants obtained using EMAs [20,23,27,37,42,46,47]. For some participant information, such as health service use (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, compliance with data collection in prospective studies that have used EMAs has been reported as high [52], and that EMAs can reduce recall bias through using real-time data collection [23,34,47]. While participant responses using EMAs are considered to be more reliable than retrospective studies [22,31,48], several study authors did identify as a potential barrier the reliability of information from participants obtained using EMAs [20,23,27,37,42,46,47]. For some participant information, such as health service use (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the post-injury cohorts in this review, only three studies collected biometric data using EMA, with heart rate [39,40] and sleep and movement activity [31] recorded. Biometric data collection measures can be felt by some participants to be intrusive [54], but may become more frequently used over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An acceptable-quality retrospective cohort study 31 found that aerobic exercise (self-initiated or physician prescribed) started 3, 5, 7 and 14 days after injury was associated with a respective 36.5% (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.53-0.76), 59.5% (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.28-0.58), 73.2% (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.16-0.45) and 88.9% (HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.22) prolonged time to return to sport (RTS) versus initiating exercise within 1 day of SRC (p<0.001). An acceptable-quality retrospective study 32 of early (<16 days from injury) supervised (in-clinic) aerobic versus nonearly supervised aerobic exercise (≥16 days from injury) showed that early exercise participants were cleared for RTS sooner (26.5±11.2 vs 35.1±26.5 days; p=0.02).…”
Section: Prescribed Aerobic Exercise Treatment Early (Within 14 Days)...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An acceptable-quality prospective cohort study 58 of college-age students showed that those with worse sleep quality after SRC took longer to recover than those with good sleep quality, and postinjury global sleep quality scores correlated with days to symptom recovery (p=0.007). An acceptable-quality prospective cohort study 59 within 72 hours of SRC measured total sleep time (TST, time spent asleep) and sleep efficiency (ratio of TST to total time between in-bed and out-of-bed times, reported as a percentage, SE%) during the 2 weeks following enrolment. Reduced TST and SE% were associated with more symptoms the next day, especially late in the day.…”
Section: Sleep After Srcmentioning
confidence: 99%