2021
DOI: 10.34067/kid.0002482020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between APOL1 Structure and Function: Clinical Implications

Abstract: This is an Early Access article. Please select the PDF button, above, to view it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study of the APOL1 C-terminal region structure complements and advances our understanding of APOL1 structure and function (6,26,27,30), further appreciating the results from computational modeling, by reference to experimental information. We also further advance the hypothesis that subtle structural, if not protein dynamics/stability changes induced by APOL1 kidney disease-associated variants could drive intracellular mechanisms in podocytes that predispose to the pathogenesis of kidney disease (22). The C-terminal domain of reference and variant APOL1 could undergo differential structural changes in response to a “second stress” stimuli attenuating the ability of the G1 and G2 variants to initiate and maintain the protein networks necessary to maintain normal podocyte homeostasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study of the APOL1 C-terminal region structure complements and advances our understanding of APOL1 structure and function (6,26,27,30), further appreciating the results from computational modeling, by reference to experimental information. We also further advance the hypothesis that subtle structural, if not protein dynamics/stability changes induced by APOL1 kidney disease-associated variants could drive intracellular mechanisms in podocytes that predispose to the pathogenesis of kidney disease (22). The C-terminal domain of reference and variant APOL1 could undergo differential structural changes in response to a “second stress” stimuli attenuating the ability of the G1 and G2 variants to initiate and maintain the protein networks necessary to maintain normal podocyte homeostasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These studies have shown that APOL1 variants dysregulate cellular homeostasis resulting in increased lysosomal permeability, loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity and cellular energy depletion, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and disordered vesicular trafficking (6,1021). In principle, these studies suggest that a change in the protein structure-function relationship could be responsible for the increased CKD risk of the two APOL1 variants, G1 and G2 (22). The biological function of proteins is usually intricately linked to their three-dimensional structure and, in many cases, also their stability, if not specific dynamic fluctuations in the protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NMR study of the SRA-ID demonstrated that it is well-structured in solution 58 and structural models predicted a coiled coil conformation 17 , 49 , 58 . However, the studies are at variance with respect to the structural influences of the disease-causing mutations G1 and G2, which were found to either stabilize 49 or destabilize 58 this conformation, perhaps due to the different lengths of SRA-ID constructs used by these groups 60 . Notwithstanding, the coiled coil model seems in conflict with the recently proposed cation channel model in which the transmembrane pore-lining region (L335–S356) 43 , roughly corresponding to the N-terminal helix of the coiled coil model, would be sequestered within the membrane and, thus, unable to participate in a coiled coil structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%