The relationship between aquaporin-4 antibody status and visual tract integrity in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A visual evoked potential study

Abstract

Background: Optic neuritis (ON) is one of the hallmark symptomatic features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). The majority of patients with NMOSD present highly specific autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4). A number of studies have reported poor visual acuity outcomes in individuals with AQP4 seropositive NMOSD, but no such relationship has been found with regard to visual evoked potentials (VEP) parameters such as the amplitude and latency of the P100 component. In this paper, we aimed (i) to describe VEP responses in patients with NMOSD; (ii) to analyze those results based on a scoring system; and (iii) to investigate the association between the VEPs and AQP4 antibody status. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the VEP responses of 40 patients with a diagnosis of NMOSD (according to the 2015 IPND criteria), including 16 with AQP4-postive status (AQP4[+]) and 24 with AQP4-negative status (AQP4[-]). In the first step, we measured the P100 peak latency and P100-N2 peak-to-peak amplitude in each patient. In the second, we converted these measures to the VEP score (0-10) using the scoring proposed by Jung et al. (2008). All recordings were performed using the same VEP device and testing protocol. Results: Abnormal VEPs were recorded in 25 of 40 patients (62.6%). Of these, 17 (42.5%) had prolonged P100 latency, and 8 (20%) had no response detected in at least one eye. The patients with ON as the initial relapse symptom had significantly higher median VEP scores than those who experienced the longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) at the disease onset (7.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.0-8.0] vs. 0.0 [IQR, 0.0-4.0], p<0.001). A lack of VEP response in at least one eye was detected more frequently in the AQP4[+] group than the AQP4[-] group (7/16 vs. 1/24, p<0.005). Logistic regression model controlling for age, gender, disease duration, and the type of relapse at onset showed an independent impact of AQP4[+] status (OR=35.45, p = 0.018) on the higher rate of absent VEP responses. In the entire group of patients (n = 40), those with AQP4[+] showed a small tendency towards a higher median VEP score (4.0 [IQR, 0.0-7.8] vs. 1.0 [IQR, 0.0-4.0], p = 0.304). Among individuals with abnormal responses (n = 25), the patients with AQP4[+] had significantly higher median VEP scores (7.0 [IQR, 4.0-8.5] vs. 3.0 [IQR, 1.0-7.0], p = 0.034) and more common bilateral involvement of the optic tracts (80% vs. 40%, p = 0.048) than those who were seronegative for anti-AQP4 antibody. A median regression analysis model controlling for age, gender, disease duration, type of onset, and number of relapses in last 12 months showed an independent association between the AQP4-positive status and a higher VEP score in patients with NMOSD (t = 2.882, df=2, p = 0.007). Conclusion: VEP study remains a useful tool in the assessment of NMOSD patients. Due to the high prevalence of absent VEPs in NMOSD patients, the scoring system appears to be more applicable for the precise analysis of VEP recordings. There is a po...

Different visual evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis and idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis: a prospective longitudinal analysis

“…Absent VEP response more frequently occurred in NMOSD-ON at the onset ( nearly 10.7% [ 5 ]–62.5% [ 13 ] in previous studies). Our study showed a lack of VEP response was at least 60%.…”

Costs of polish county hospitals–A behavioral panel function

“…In case of the competition for the payer funds, the hospitals which are included in the network have a privileged position as after the contract is signed, they do not need to enter a wager. Of course, there is also a possibility of over-performance, the costs of which are not covered by the payer (see [ 46 ]). In the current study in case of FE model the effect of HHI is negative but insignificant, while in the RE model it is positive, yet still insignificant.…”