1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb04477.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between body form and habit in some Carabidae (Coleoptera)

Abstract: With 12 figures in the text)Variations in height of prothorax and hind body; hind body, prothorax, labrum, clypeus and metatergum widths; metasternum, metatergum and wing lengths; eye protuberance and width of antennal insertions are discussed and compared with body lengths in different species of carabid beetles. These various parameters have been displayed in the form of tables, ratios and graphs; they have also been discussed in relation to the various habits (i.e. feeding, locomotory, burrowing, flying) of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Management management intensity index (see Materials and Methods: Environmental data) tributes, following previous studies that showed their likely functional significance, as assessed with phylogenetic comparative methods (Ribera et al 1999a, b, and references therein). They included major linear dimensions of the body, hind legs, eyes, and antennae, following the approach of previous work (e.g., Forsythe 1987, Ribera et al 1999a). Six specimens were measured per species, one male and one female from three different localities and dates, to avoid possible biases due to sexual dimorphism, and geographical or temporal variability.…”
Section: Morphological Characteristics Of the Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management management intensity index (see Materials and Methods: Environmental data) tributes, following previous studies that showed their likely functional significance, as assessed with phylogenetic comparative methods (Ribera et al 1999a, b, and references therein). They included major linear dimensions of the body, hind legs, eyes, and antennae, following the approach of previous work (e.g., Forsythe 1987, Ribera et al 1999a). Six specimens were measured per species, one male and one female from three different localities and dates, to avoid possible biases due to sexual dimorphism, and geographical or temporal variability.…”
Section: Morphological Characteristics Of the Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algumas síndromes morfológicas podem ser sugeridas a partir da observação das espécies associadas ao modo de vida subterrâneo: olhos ausentes ou muito reduzidos, tegumento despigmentado e tamanho relativo pequeno. Em Coleoptera fossoriais (como Carabinae: Scaritini) é possível observar modificações estruturais na parte posterior do corpo e do protórax, adaptadas ao modo de vida subterrâneo (Forsythe, 1987).…”
Section: Comparação Entre a Fauna Subterrânea E De Serapilheiraunclassified
“…One way to detect ecological similarities among species is to sort them into groups based on life history attributes, requiring a broad understanding of the ecology of the species (Ribera et al, 2001;Cole et al, 2002). Such information exists for carabids (Lindroth, 1969(Lindroth, , 1974Forsythe, 1987) whose sensitivity to environmental change is widely recognized (Refseth, 1980;Gardner, 1991;Rieske and Buss, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%