2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1011261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Borrower Risk and Loan Maturity in Small Business Lending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hernández-Cánovas and Koëter-Kant (2008), Ortiz-Molina and Penas (2008) and Kirschenmann and Norden (2010)). The descriptive statistics in Table 3 suggest that amount and maturity are complementary loan terms for the majority of loans.…”
Section: Loan Maturity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernández-Cánovas and Koëter-Kant (2008), Ortiz-Molina and Penas (2008) and Kirschenmann and Norden (2010)). The descriptive statistics in Table 3 suggest that amount and maturity are complementary loan terms for the majority of loans.…”
Section: Loan Maturity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In unstable economic settings, both low‐ and high‐risk firms are likely to prefer longer maturities to avoid rollover uncertainties related to interest rate policy (Flannery, ) and supply of bank loans (Diamond, ). Banks are likely to set shorter loan maturities, particularly for high‐risk firms, to facilitate and increase the efficiency of their monitoring (Berlin & Mester, ) and to reduce the capital required by regulators and supervisors (Kirschenmann & Norden, ). In light of the multitude of predictions, we expect low‐risk firms to prefer longer maturities to reduce uncertainties related to rolling over their debts, and high‐risk firms to obtain shorter maturities from their banks with the aim of facilitating their monitoring and providing flexibility in renegotiation.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differing findings may be linked to the fact that the original theories that relate credit risk to loan maturities were developed for market debt and not bank loans; alternatively, the survey data used in Scherr and Hulburt (), Berger et al (), and Ortiz‐Molina and Penas (), for example, are average responses of firms. In Europe, Magri () and Kirschenmann and Norden () find a more consistent negative relation between credit risk and loan maturities in Italy (1993–2000) where the enforceability of contracts is poor; and Germany (2005) where firms have high bargaining power . The distinct findings for the United States and Europe may be explained by their institutional contexts, more specifically, the market emphasis in the United States vs. bank emphasis in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-credit services cross-sold to the borrower, and the additional bank clients referred by the borrower can increase the income of commercial banks. In addition, Kirschenmann(2010), Gropp, Gruendl and Guettler(2011), Kirschenmann and Norden(2012) proposed the other representative research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%