Acta Herpetologica 2018
DOI: 10.13128/acta_herpetol-20920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between brain size and digestive tract length do not support expensive-tissue hypothesis in Hylarana guentheri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have shown a significant negative correlation between brain size and digestive tract length, thus supporting the ETH (Kaufman, 2003;Jin et al, 2015;Tsuboi et al, 2015;Liao et al, 2016). On the contrary, other studies have found no such relationship or even the opposite (Lemaître et al, 2009;Barrickman and Lin, 2010;Navarrete et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2018). The study of Opsanus tau shows that increased investment in one structure does not necessarily drive a loss of mass in one or more organs (Dornburg et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have shown a significant negative correlation between brain size and digestive tract length, thus supporting the ETH (Kaufman, 2003;Jin et al, 2015;Tsuboi et al, 2015;Liao et al, 2016). On the contrary, other studies have found no such relationship or even the opposite (Lemaître et al, 2009;Barrickman and Lin, 2010;Navarrete et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2018). The study of Opsanus tau shows that increased investment in one structure does not necessarily drive a loss of mass in one or more organs (Dornburg et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The relative brain size of Rana omeimontis was significantly negatively correlated with the relative digestive tract length, and energy restriction could explain the change in brain size, thus supporting the ETH (Jin et al, 2015). However, some studies suggested that the relative brain size was not significantly correlated with the relative digestive tract length, and the change in brain size could not be explained by energy restriction, which did not support the ETH (Liao et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2018). Besides, the study found no negative correlation between brain mass and intestinal length, and even no negative correlation was discovered between brain mass and the mass of other organs in Bufo gargarizans (Mi and Liao, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, environmental stimuli were found to increase the brain weight of rabbit males [6], probably due to stimulating neurogenesis in the hippocampus [7] or the higher energy requirements of animals [8]. Changes in brain size can also be supported by the expensive-tissue hypothesis, which predicts that the higher the brain size, the lower the size of another costly organ, such as the gut or others [9]. Additionally, the ability to learn tasks is a stimulus of increasing brain size [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species lives in pools, ditches, paddy fields and freshwater body (Wu et al, 2014), playing important roles in pest control as well as aquatic and terrestrial food webs (Shao et al, 2018). Its breeding season starts from March to June with the proportion of females and males 1:2.02 (Liu et al, 2018;Zou et al, 2003). The breeding males have swollen nuptial pads on thumb, whereas females have mature oocytes (Zou et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%