2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-021-09610-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Citizen Oversight and Procedural Justice Measures in Policing: An Exploratory Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hougland and Wolf (2017) found that CALEA accreditation did not have a significant relationship with the volume of citizen complaints agencies receive or the number of sustained complaint investigations. Holliday and Wagstaff (2021) found that CALEA accreditation has a positive and statistically significant relationship with satisfaction with the police ( p < 0.10), trust in the police ( p < 0.01), belief that the police treat all people equally ( p < 0.01), belief that the police are held accountable ( p < 0.01), and belief that the police are building positive community relationships ( p < 0.01). Overall, we found no evidence that CALEA accreditation is associated with the work benefits of law enforcement officers, but we did find evidence that CALEA accreditation is associated with certain work procedures and work processes in law enforcement agencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hougland and Wolf (2017) found that CALEA accreditation did not have a significant relationship with the volume of citizen complaints agencies receive or the number of sustained complaint investigations. Holliday and Wagstaff (2021) found that CALEA accreditation has a positive and statistically significant relationship with satisfaction with the police ( p < 0.10), trust in the police ( p < 0.01), belief that the police treat all people equally ( p < 0.01), belief that the police are held accountable ( p < 0.01), and belief that the police are building positive community relationships ( p < 0.01). Overall, we found no evidence that CALEA accreditation is associated with the work benefits of law enforcement officers, but we did find evidence that CALEA accreditation is associated with certain work procedures and work processes in law enforcement agencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in the broader context, community members’ trust in the police, as well as, perception of psychological safety to willingly engage with the police is dependent on perception of procedural justice evidenced in the routine operations of the police. The principle of procedural justice posits that public perception of fairness in the discharge of police officers’ duties and responsibilities is an antecedent of citizens’ trustworthiness in the police and correspondingly influence their attitudes and engagements with the police (Bell, 2017; Holliday and Wagstaff, 2021). Consequently, this may lead to early detection of crimes by the police (Hurley and Boulton, 2021).…”
Section: Community Policing Experience Public Trust and Psychological...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, though there is a paucity of research on the impacts of police accreditation, there is some evidence that police accreditation is correlated with some positive outputs and outcomes (Abner and Rush, 2022). Holliday and Wagstaff (2021) compiled public opinion surveys from 48 US cities and examined the factors related to the public's attitudes towards the police. They found that CALEA accreditation had a positive and statistically significant relationship with satisfaction with the police ( p < 0.10), trust in the police ( p < 0.01), belief that police treat all people equally ( p < 0.01), belief that police are held accountable ( p < 0.01), and belief that police are building positive community relationships ( p < 0.01).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%