2015
DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1068687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between core symptoms of ADHD and the Cognitive Reflection Test in a non-clinical sample

Abstract: Introduction: Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms are frequently

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a non-clinical sample of adults, Kim (2004) found inattention was predicted by verbal WM performance. Other research on non-clinical inattention in adults has found inattention to be the only symptom of ADHD to predict performance on a reasoning task strongly correlated with WM (the Cognitive Reflection Test; Stupple et al, 2013 ; Elisa and Parris, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a non-clinical sample of adults, Kim (2004) found inattention was predicted by verbal WM performance. Other research on non-clinical inattention in adults has found inattention to be the only symptom of ADHD to predict performance on a reasoning task strongly correlated with WM (the Cognitive Reflection Test; Stupple et al, 2013 ; Elisa and Parris, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, under the cognitive underload view of the SART 15 , 40 – 42 , the task effectively promotes inattention. Thus given the nature of the task and evident issues those with inattention have with working memory, cognitive effort 43 and sustained attention 38 , 44 , it is reasonable to think that high inattentive traits would be associated with frequent deliberate mind wandering, especially in the easy condition. Alternatively, under the cognitive overload view, performing the SART requires constant monitoring over time, using executive resources, and as such inattentive individuals would be expected to report frequent spontaneous mind wandering, especially when the task is more difficult (when the digits are presented randomly) due to their limited working memory capacity 35 , 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%