2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between dietary quality and the local food environment differs according to level of educational attainment: A cross-sectional study

Abstract: There is evidence that food outlet access differs according to level of neighbourhood deprivation but little is known about how individual circumstances affect associations between food outlet access and diet. This study explored the relationship between dietary quality and a measure of overall food environment, representing the balance between healthy and unhealthy food outlet access in individualised activity spaces. Furthermore, this study is the first to assess effect modification of level of educational a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical findings from included studies may not apply to all individuals, particularly for those studies that made use of large population data sets. The relationships between spatial exposure to food outlets and dietary intake may vary for particular sub-groups or individuals with certain demographic characteristics [ 74 ]. Furthermore, it was not possible to standardise all effect sizes, so conclusions regarding the comparative magnitude of some within-study effects should also be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical findings from included studies may not apply to all individuals, particularly for those studies that made use of large population data sets. The relationships between spatial exposure to food outlets and dietary intake may vary for particular sub-groups or individuals with certain demographic characteristics [ 74 ]. Furthermore, it was not possible to standardise all effect sizes, so conclusions regarding the comparative magnitude of some within-study effects should also be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These healthiness scores were included to avoid a dichotomous categorization of retail outlets into either ‘healthy’ or ‘unhealthy’ and to give a more nuanced indication of the healthiness of school food environments, based on the overall number of retailers selling food. Based on the methodology of and in line with international research [ 34 , 35 ], the healthiness score was derived from an online Delphi study including 20 academics and nutrition experts from The Netherlands working in the field of public health nutrition, epidemiology, health science or eating psychology [ 36 ]. In several (anonymous) rounds, scores and rationales for each outlet were provided by each expert.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Food environment assessment tool (Feat) provides data on the density of fast food outlets and supermarkets by local authority, and can be used to assess density by neighbourhood deprivation. [19] Fast food outlets are most prevalent in deprived neighbourhoods [20,21] and monitoring using Feat could support local authority planning decisions to help improve preconception health among disadvantaged groups [22]. EuroMonitor data could be used to track sales of vitamin and mineral supplements, such as folic acid, recommended before conception by the NHS, as an indicator of increasing societal awareness of the importance of micronutrient sufficiency for a healthy pregnancy.…”
Section: Food Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%