2016
DOI: 10.1080/1081602x.2016.1230509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between family characteristics and height in Sardinia at the turn of the twentieth century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating the extent and direction of selection biases in conscript records will allow us to improve the relevance and quality of recorded heights as an indicator of the biological standard or living. Moreover, doing so will help us to better understand variation found in heights by social groups, religion, and family composition (e.g., Kok et al 2017;Mazzoni et al 2017;Öberg 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the extent and direction of selection biases in conscript records will allow us to improve the relevance and quality of recorded heights as an indicator of the biological standard or living. Moreover, doing so will help us to better understand variation found in heights by social groups, religion, and family composition (e.g., Kok et al 2017;Mazzoni et al 2017;Öberg 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument is mainly based on the relation between sibship size, income and nutritional dilution, crowding and the higher chances of infection in larger families (Bailey, Hatton, & Inwood, 2016;Hatton, 2017). Yet results are mixed: some studies found a significant negative effect of the number of siblings on the height of individuals (De Keyser & Van Rossem, 2017;Mazzoni, Breschi, Manfredini, Pozzi, & Ruiu, 2017;Myrskylä, Silventoinen, Jelenkovic, Tynelius, & Rasmussen, 2013;Roberts & Warren, 2017;Stradford, van Poppel, & Lumey, 2017), while others found effects which are weak or disappear over time (Beekink & Kok, 2017;Öberg, 2015;Poulain, Chambre, Herm, & Pes, 2017;Ramon-Muñoz & Ramon-Muñoz, 2017). The latter argued that the changing role of sibship size could be caused by fertility decline, the general improvement of standards of living, the development of the welfare state, and improving health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily nutrition is often thought to be one of the most important determinants to prevent and survive infectious diseases, which were more prevalent and virulent in the 19 th century (Fogel & Costa, 1997;McKeown, 1976;Preston, 1976;Rotberg & Rabb, 1985). Differences in access to food were considerable and caused differences in human stature: elite and farmer children were on average taller than their fellow countrymen, whereas children of laborers were shorter than the rest of the population (Alter & Oris, 2008;Beekink & Kok, 2017;Komlos, 1990;Mazzoni et al, 2017;Öberg, 2014;Ramon-Muñoz & Ramon-Muñoz, 2017). The relationship between parental socioeconomic status and mortality in the first five years of life seems to follow a similar pattern.…”
Section: Shared Socioeconomic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%