1996
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.1996.9664474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Fish Assemblages and Environmental Gradients in an Oklahoma Prairie Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pools are more likely to form in headwater reaches of prairie streams (Taylor et al 1996); thus, tolerances to environmental conditions such as high temperatures and salinities and low dissolved oxygen concentrations may influence fish composition over larger geographic scales (Ostrand 2000). Variable environmental conditions upstream, which become less variable downstream, have been suggested to be a common causal mechanism for longitudinal zonation of fish species (Matthews and Styron 1981;Taylor et al 1993;Williams et al 1996). Headwater stream reaches that are not spring-fed are often intermittent and environmentally harsher than the larger tributaries and mainstreams (Starrett 1950;Neel 1951;Metcalf 1959;Whiteside and McNatt 1972), particularly during periods of low flow and drought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pools are more likely to form in headwater reaches of prairie streams (Taylor et al 1996); thus, tolerances to environmental conditions such as high temperatures and salinities and low dissolved oxygen concentrations may influence fish composition over larger geographic scales (Ostrand 2000). Variable environmental conditions upstream, which become less variable downstream, have been suggested to be a common causal mechanism for longitudinal zonation of fish species (Matthews and Styron 1981;Taylor et al 1993;Williams et al 1996). Headwater stream reaches that are not spring-fed are often intermittent and environmentally harsher than the larger tributaries and mainstreams (Starrett 1950;Neel 1951;Metcalf 1959;Whiteside and McNatt 1972), particularly during periods of low flow and drought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are classification and ordination (Tonn and Magnuson 1982), stepwise regression (Matuszek and Beggs 1988;Berrebi dit Thomas et al 1998) or regression tree analysis (Rathert et al 1999). A favourite method of gradient analysis in community study is canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (Matthews 1998;Rodriguez and Magnan 1995;Harvey 1996;Williams et al 1996). CCA optimizes the description of sampling sites by their species lists and the description of species ecological traits by the distinctive features of the sites where they are found (Palmer 1993).…”
Section: Seasonnaly Floodedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While elevation may be a proxy for water temperature, stream size probably reflects differences in the geomorphology and position of a stream reach in a watershed (Bozek & Hubert 1992;Isaak & Hubert 2001). Studies on longitudinal zonation and addition of fishes in lotic systems have generally shown that species have boundaries related to stream size (e.g., Rahel & Hubert 1991;Williams et al 1996;Quist et al 2004). Although we used our data (as opposed to an independent data set) to establish thresholds of elevation and stream size for each species, this approach was appropriate because including reaches outside the known distribution of a species would confound analyses and obscure ecological interpretations.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%