2024
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Gestational Diabetes and the Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ethan Slouha,
Kaitlyn M Gates,
Hanin Al-Geizi
et al.

Abstract: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common endocrine disorders to occur during pregnancy due to the increase in circulating human placental lactogen (hPL) and possible beta-cell sensitivity. While GDM can be managed either with diet and exercise or pharmacological interventions, it is associated with significant maternal and neonatal complications. Maternal complications include short-and long-term conditions such as pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, arrest of labor, future development of type 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Cochrane risk bias tool, three systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies were included: Tong G.-X., Wang Y. and Slouha E [29,32,35]. Six domains were used to classify and rate the context of each study with the following information, random sequence generation, allocation concealment, participant and personnel blinding, outcome assessment blinding, incomplete outcome data and biased reporting and further biased sources.…”
Section: Cochrane Risk Bias Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the Cochrane risk bias tool, three systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies were included: Tong G.-X., Wang Y. and Slouha E [29,32,35]. Six domains were used to classify and rate the context of each study with the following information, random sequence generation, allocation concealment, participant and personnel blinding, outcome assessment blinding, incomplete outcome data and biased reporting and further biased sources.…”
Section: Cochrane Risk Bias Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Tong G.-X [29] received the highest score of the three, which was 6, as it included all relevant information. The study of Slouha E. [35] received a score of 5, and the study of Wang Y. [32] received the lowest score of 2 (Table 6).…”
Section: Cochrane Risk Bias Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations