1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1979.tb00229.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between gingival inflammation and resistance to probe penetration

Abstract: The present investigation was carried out to determine the location of the periodontal probe tip when various loads are applied. Additionally, the role of gingival inflammation to probe resistance was evaluated.The sample consisted of 51 teeth scheduled for extraction. The Gingival Index (GI) was used to establish the degree of inflammation. A loading of 20, 25, 30 ponds was delivered by a spring loaded, sleeve bearing probe fitted with a Michigan 0 probe having a terminal diameter of 0.35 mm. The extracted te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
84
1
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
84
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Differences in patient population, study design, measurement techniques, microbial pathogens, disease activity, and human defect variation between populations make it difficult to compare clinical results.17 37 Although several defect characteristics which may effect healing responses have been identified, control of these factors in a human clinical comparison study is impossible. [39][40][41][42] The improved clinical hard and soft tissue responses at the bioactive glass treated sites may be a function of the chemical reactivity of the material. [39][40][41][42] The improved clinical hard and soft tissue responses at the bioactive glass treated sites may be a function of the chemical reactivity of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Differences in patient population, study design, measurement techniques, microbial pathogens, disease activity, and human defect variation between populations make it difficult to compare clinical results.17 37 Although several defect characteristics which may effect healing responses have been identified, control of these factors in a human clinical comparison study is impossible. [39][40][41][42] The improved clinical hard and soft tissue responses at the bioactive glass treated sites may be a function of the chemical reactivity of the material. [39][40][41][42] The improved clinical hard and soft tissue responses at the bioactive glass treated sites may be a function of the chemical reactivity of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual probes were used to measure the variables. The ability of a probe to penetrate into a periodontal pocket is related to several factors like the probing force, diameter of the probe and the gingival tissue tone (1,19,26). In the present study, Williams color-coded probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) was used throughout in order to ensure the consistency in probe diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to inflammation of the periodontal pocket. Inflamed pockets may result in the overestimation of CAL 20 . It could also reflect the unintended bias by the examiner in the unblinded registration, although this is less likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%