1993
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90339-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between Holland's theory of vocational interest and Eysenck's model of personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These dimensions serve as the theoretical basis for spherical models of interest in which a third dimensionprestige or sex type-has been proposed in addition to peoplethings and data-ideas (Deng, Armstrong, & Rounds, 2007; also see Tracey & Rounds, 1996). For example, in an examination of the relationship between vocational interests and personahty types, Goh and Leong (1993) interpreted the realistic type as a tendency to "move away from people," "asocial, not caring for people, lacking of feeling, and lacking interpersonal skills," posing them as the opposite of social-type individuals who "have the beneflts and demands of rich interpersonal lives" (p. 560). For example, in an examination of the relationship between vocational interests and personahty types, Goh and Leong (1993) interpreted the realistic type as a tendency to "move away from people," "asocial, not caring for people, lacking of feeling, and lacking interpersonal skills," posing them as the opposite of social-type individuals who "have the beneflts and demands of rich interpersonal lives" (p. 560).…”
Section: Bipolarity Of the People-things And Data-ideas Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dimensions serve as the theoretical basis for spherical models of interest in which a third dimensionprestige or sex type-has been proposed in addition to peoplethings and data-ideas (Deng, Armstrong, & Rounds, 2007; also see Tracey & Rounds, 1996). For example, in an examination of the relationship between vocational interests and personahty types, Goh and Leong (1993) interpreted the realistic type as a tendency to "move away from people," "asocial, not caring for people, lacking of feeling, and lacking interpersonal skills," posing them as the opposite of social-type individuals who "have the beneflts and demands of rich interpersonal lives" (p. 560). For example, in an examination of the relationship between vocational interests and personahty types, Goh and Leong (1993) interpreted the realistic type as a tendency to "move away from people," "asocial, not caring for people, lacking of feeling, and lacking interpersonal skills," posing them as the opposite of social-type individuals who "have the beneflts and demands of rich interpersonal lives" (p. 560).…”
Section: Bipolarity Of the People-things And Data-ideas Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Goh and Leong (1993) and Barrick et al (2003) hypothesized that interestpersonality correlations might be lower for student samples than adult samples due to students having less differentiation in their personalities and interests than working adults, this age variable did not appear to have a significant impact on findings of the present study. In their results, Barrick et al reported that relations were "somewhat stronger" (mean increase of .07) for working samples than student samples, with particularly large increases for the Enterprising GOT with FFM traits and for Openness to Experience with RIASEC GOTs.…”
Section: Genetic Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In their discussion of age as a possible moderator, Barrick et al cite a study by Goh and Leong (1993), which suggests that the strength of personalityinterest relations may differ for college students and working adults. Specifically, the expectation is that working adults would have more differentiated interests.…”
Section: Comparison Of Substantial Correlations Between Riasec and Ffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respecto a las relaciones entre la Clave Profesional y al 16PF, tal como afirmaban Holland & Gottfredson (1992) no parece que estos dos tipos de pruebas sean intercambiables, aunque parece evidente la existencia de relaciones significativas entre los constructos de intereses y personalidad. Se confirman las relaciones entre las escalas RIASEC y la dimensión de Extroversión (Goh & Leong, 1993), en particular, relaciones positivas con los tipos Social y Emprendedor (Tokar & Swanson, 1995) pero otras relaciones no resultan tan claras como las relaciones negativas entre el tipo Emprendedor y el neuroticismo, el tipo investigador y la extroversión, entre el tipo Emprendedor y la extroversión -ésta última sólo confirmada en el caso de las mujeres-.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified