2011
DOI: 10.1108/02641611111112101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between ILL/document supply and journal subscriptions

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this article is to provide insights into the relationship between ILL/ document supply and journal subscriptions and to assess recent trends in the ILL service. Design/methodology/Approach: This survey is based on data from the ILL service conducted over the five year period 2005-2009 through the Italian NILDE (Network for Inter-Library Document Exchange) network. Findings: This article bears out important previous findings that ILL is not used as a surrogate for journal subscriptions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Elena Bernardini notes that it behooves publishers to allow ILL of their titles because "analysis of transaction data often has a positive effect on new titles acquisitions." 4 In broad strokes, Herbert White notes that "anything 'borrowed' often enough to endanger fair use criteria should be bought immediately." 5 Peggy Johnson writes in her standard guide to collection development that "repeated requests from users for articles from a particular journal suggest that journal should be added to the collection."…”
Section: Examining Assumptions About the Use Of Ill Data For Collectimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Elena Bernardini notes that it behooves publishers to allow ILL of their titles because "analysis of transaction data often has a positive effect on new titles acquisitions." 4 In broad strokes, Herbert White notes that "anything 'borrowed' often enough to endanger fair use criteria should be bought immediately." 5 Peggy Johnson writes in her standard guide to collection development that "repeated requests from users for articles from a particular journal suggest that journal should be added to the collection."…”
Section: Examining Assumptions About the Use Of Ill Data For Collectimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies could also look at the staffing question touched upon by the authors, such as a smaller scale comparison of the success rates of professionally qualified staff and paraprofessionals in the fulfilment of ILL requests. A study similar to that carried out by Bernardini & Mangiaracina (2011), who investigated the types of items that are being requested by ILL after the introduction of subscription bundles in Italy, would also be an interesting addition to the literature. ILL is a rapidly changing area of librarianship, particularly with continuing technological advances such as e-books, so it is an area which requires continual research.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are highly critical of publishers imposing contractual constraints and argue that publishers should support document supply as it gives access to their titles that would not otherwise be known. They also judge that many factors contribute to the increase in document supply in Italy via NILDE (86,320 in 2005 to 137,065 in 2009) – greater exposure to material, more researchers, and efficient document supply via NILDE has a greater impact than the decline associated with Big Deals (Bernadini and Mangiaracina, 2010). Another study in Japan analyses an even bigger database – 10 million requests over 15 years.…”
Section: Big Dealsmentioning
confidence: 99%