2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between individual variation in macroscale functional gradients and distinct aspects of ongoing thought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
86
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
86
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this occurred across multiple different contexts, including complex external tasks, this pattern is inconsistent with views on the DMN as facilitating purely automatic ( Shamloo and Helie, 2016 ), social ( Jenkins, 2019 ), or self-relevant ( van der Linden et al, 2020 ) processes. Instead, these results are consistent with the notion that certain regions of the DMN play a role in ongoing experience that is linked to “how” experiences emerge or unfold ( Leech and Smallwood, 2019 ), possibly reflecting a role of the DMN in supporting more integrated forms of cognition ( Mckeown et al, 2020 ). It will also be important to determine the extent to which different thought patterns recruit the DMN as a whole or instead whether different mental states fractionate the “canonical” DMN, creating subnetworks that are engaged in different types of cognitive state.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Since this occurred across multiple different contexts, including complex external tasks, this pattern is inconsistent with views on the DMN as facilitating purely automatic ( Shamloo and Helie, 2016 ), social ( Jenkins, 2019 ), or self-relevant ( van der Linden et al, 2020 ) processes. Instead, these results are consistent with the notion that certain regions of the DMN play a role in ongoing experience that is linked to “how” experiences emerge or unfold ( Leech and Smallwood, 2019 ), possibly reflecting a role of the DMN in supporting more integrated forms of cognition ( Mckeown et al, 2020 ). It will also be important to determine the extent to which different thought patterns recruit the DMN as a whole or instead whether different mental states fractionate the “canonical” DMN, creating subnetworks that are engaged in different types of cognitive state.…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…24,59 The coupling patterns of primary sensory/motor regions with association networks, including DMN and FPCN, have previously been linked to individual differences in specific contents of experience during mind wandering. 27,28 Within-DMN connectivity contributed both positively and negatively to the SITUT-CPM, consistent with evidence for within-DMN functional heterogeneity. 60,76 Prior research suggests that individual differences in trait mind wandering are both positively and negatively associated with within-DMN functional connectivity.…”
Section: Neural Basis Of Mind Wanderingsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Our findings are more consistent with recent findings that DMN and MDN have functional similarities, despite their well-documented activation differences. For example, these brain regions can have similar representational formats (González-García et al, 2018) and they occupy adjacent positions on the principal gradient of connectivity, which explains the most variance in a decomposition of resting-state fMRI (Margulies et al, 2016;Mckeown et al, 2020) An adequate account of the role of DMN in semantic cognition needs to explain the stronger activation typically seen in this network when the meanings of inputs are well-aligned with recent experience or long-term memory, as well as the sensitivity of this network to changing task goals. One possibility is provided by views that envisage DMN regions as "integrative hubs" (Braga et al, 2013), drawing together inputs from highly diverse networks, including unimodal regions relevant to the varied features of concrete concepts (e.g., colour, shape, size) (Margulies et al, 2016;Lanzoni et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%