2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between jugular bulb position and jugular bulb related inner ear dehiscence: a retrospective analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Buckwalter et al (1983) and Chandler (1983) promoted jugular vein ligation as a treatment for PT, which has since been determined ineffective (Jin and Wang, 2015). Additionally, the presence of a HJB alone is not itself predictive of PT; Marsot-Dupuch (2001) determined that only 4.5% of patients with an enlarged jugular bulb ever develop PT, while Park et al (2015) found a 35% prevalence of HJB in patients with hearing loss. The ambiguity of the role of abnormal jugular vein geometries and flow rate in PT pathology suggests the link between flow, shape, and sound, if it exists, must be complex; simply observing the flow rate and bulb shape is not enough to identify the origin of venous PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Buckwalter et al (1983) and Chandler (1983) promoted jugular vein ligation as a treatment for PT, which has since been determined ineffective (Jin and Wang, 2015). Additionally, the presence of a HJB alone is not itself predictive of PT; Marsot-Dupuch (2001) determined that only 4.5% of patients with an enlarged jugular bulb ever develop PT, while Park et al (2015) found a 35% prevalence of HJB in patients with hearing loss. The ambiguity of the role of abnormal jugular vein geometries and flow rate in PT pathology suggests the link between flow, shape, and sound, if it exists, must be complex; simply observing the flow rate and bulb shape is not enough to identify the origin of venous PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have suggested that the term SSCDS be replaced with otic capsule dehiscence syndrome (OCDS) or third window syndrome (TWS) because SSCD symptoms and diagnostic findings can occur with posterior semicircular canal dehiscence, internal carotid arterycochlea dehiscence, posterior semicircular canal-jugular bulb dehiscence, wide vestibular aqueduct in children (personal communication, Dr. Soumit Dasgupta, March 3, 2017), posttraumatic hypermobile stapes footplate (personal communication, Dr. Arun Gadre, August 1, 2015) and in patients with CT-TWS. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] We have reported the development of CT-TWS developing in a delayed manner after surgical plugging and resurfacing of CT1 SSCD TWS. 2,3 John Carey's group has also noted that in a series of near-SSCD patients undergoing plugging and resurfacing procedures all patients noted initial improvement in at least one presenting TWS symptom; however, 5 subjects (45%) had persistence or recurrence of at least 1 TWS symptom at greater than 1 month after surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al subclassified HRJB into two types based on axial CT images: type 1, in which the bulb dome reaches above the inferior part of the round window; and type 2, when the dome is higher than the inferior edge of the IAC. 28,29 It is apparent that there is no consensus on the exact definition of HRJB, and multiplanar structures that define the critical microsurgical boundaries (SCC, IAC, round window, and endolymphatic sac) of the skull base cannot often be analyzed based only on limited standard axial CT sections of temporal bone, without reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%