1992
DOI: 10.5032/jae.1992.02016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Learning And Teaching Styles And Student Performance In A Methods Of Teaching Agriculture Course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory suggests that small groups are more satisfying for extraverted learners who thrive in group environments and learn best by sharing their thoughts with others (Jung, 1971). The findings of this study add to the divergent field of literature pertaining to learning style in both agricultural education as well as other educational disciplines (Cano, et al, 1992;Garton et al, 1999;Marrison & Frick, 1994;Thornton, Haskell, & Libby, 2006;Whittington & Raven, 1995) and confirms the findings of Marrison and Frick (1994) who found that learning style produced no significant differences in academic achievement.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theory suggests that small groups are more satisfying for extraverted learners who thrive in group environments and learn best by sharing their thoughts with others (Jung, 1971). The findings of this study add to the divergent field of literature pertaining to learning style in both agricultural education as well as other educational disciplines (Cano, et al, 1992;Garton et al, 1999;Marrison & Frick, 1994;Thornton, Haskell, & Libby, 2006;Whittington & Raven, 1995) and confirms the findings of Marrison and Frick (1994) who found that learning style produced no significant differences in academic achievement.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They are fascinated with scientific ideas and are future oriented. (Shindler & Yang, 2003) Many agricultural education scholars have focused their work on the impact of learning styles on various attributes including teaching impact, learning outcomes, satisfaction with schooling and mentoring experiences, and creative thinking (Cano & Garton, 1994;Cano et al, 1992;Dyer & Osborne, 1996;Friedel & Rudd, 2006;Garton et al, 1999;Lambert et al, 2010;Marrison & Frick, 1994;Whittington & Raven, 1995). The wider body of educational research (Hansen & Stansfield, 1982;McDonald, 1984;Mehdikhani, 1983;Miller, 1991;Paradise & Block, 1984) has also used learning styles as a key variable for examining the impact of style upon similar constructs, with similar results -no significant differences between groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Cano, Garton, and Raven (1992), two of the most widely studied learning styles are field-dependence and field-independence. Witkin, Moore, Goodenough, and Cox (1977) described the extremes of the aforementioned continuum as follows: when perception is strongly dominated by the prevailing field (a region, space, or sphere where mental or physical activity exists), that mode of perception is designated as "Field-Dependent," but when the person experiences items as more or less separate from the surrounding field, the perception is designated as "Field-Independent" (p. 7).…”
Section: Learning Styles Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garger and Guild (1984, p. 11) described learning styles as "...stable and pervasive characteristics of an individual, expressed through the interaction of one's behavior and personahty as one approaches a learning task." According to Cano, Garton, and Raven (1992), one of the most widely studied learning style theories contrasts field-dependence and field-independence. The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), a standardized cognitive test, can be administered to determine the preferred learning styles of the learners as either field-dependent or field-independent (Oilman, .…”
Section: Summary Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%