2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between magma and mineralization in Chaobuleng iron polymetallic deposit, Inner Mongolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These lines imply that an extensional environment in a post‐orogenic setting existed in the central and southern Great Xing'an Range (Figure ), related to the upwelling of the asthenosphere due to delamination of the thickened crust (Li, Ding, et al, ; Liu et al, ). This interpretation is also supported by the existence of late Jurassic bimodal volcanic rocks in Northern Great Xing'an Range (Li, Ding et al, ), and numerous coeval A‐type and S‐type granites in the NE China (Liu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Yang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These lines imply that an extensional environment in a post‐orogenic setting existed in the central and southern Great Xing'an Range (Figure ), related to the upwelling of the asthenosphere due to delamination of the thickened crust (Li, Ding, et al, ; Liu et al, ). This interpretation is also supported by the existence of late Jurassic bimodal volcanic rocks in Northern Great Xing'an Range (Li, Ding et al, ), and numerous coeval A‐type and S‐type granites in the NE China (Liu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Yang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Xing'an Range (Li, Ding et al, 2015), and numerous coeval A-type and S-type granites in the NE China Wu et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2014). 2.…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The North China craton (also referred to as the Sino‐Korean craton or platform in the literature) is bounded to the southwest by the early Paleozoic Qilian orogen (e.g., Song et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu, Zuza, et al, ; Xiao et al, ; Zuza et al, ), to the north by the late Paleozoic Central Asian Orogenic Belt (Kröner et al, ; Wu, Wang, et al, ; Xiao et al, ), to the east by the Mesozoic Su‐Lu and Jiao‐Liao‐Ji orogen belt (Pei et al, ; C. Peng et al, ; Yang et al, ; Wu et al, ), and to the south by the Mesozoic Qinling‐Dabie Shan orogen (Figure ). The craton is divided into several different tectonic units, which traditionally consists of two major Archean‐Proterozoic blocks (i.e., the Eastern and Western blocks) separated by the intervening ~1,500‐km‐long north trending Neoarchean‐Paleoproterozoic Central Orogenic Belt (Figure ; Kusky & Li, ; Kusky et al, , ; Meert & Santosh, ; C. Peng et al, ; P. Peng et al, ; Santosh, ; Wang et al, , ; Zhai, , ; Zhai & Liu, ; Zhai & Peng, ; Zhai & Santosh, ; Zhai et al, , , ) The Eastern block contains 3.8‐ to 2.6‐Ga gneiss and greenstone belts overlain by 2.6‐ to 2.5‐Ga metasedimentary cover, which is made up of the Longgang and Nangrim blocks that joined along the Paleoproterozoic Jiao‐Liao‐Ji deformed volcano‐sedimentary belt (Figure ; e.g., Kusky et al, ; Tam et al, ; Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallogenic events discussed in this paper occurred in all three geodynamic regimes (particularly during the closure of the PAO), resulting in the development of one of the most important hydrothermal mineralization systems in the EDMB. Various types of deposit formed in the EDMB, including skarn type (e.g., the large‐scale Chaobuleng and Chagan Obao Fe–Zn deposits; Nie, Zhang, et al, ; Wu et al, ; Zhang, Nie, Jiang, et al, ), porphyry type (e.g., the large‐scale Qiyanqin'amu and Zhunsujihua Mo deposits; Sun et al, ; Liu, Nie, et al, ; Sun, Huang, Yan, et al, ; Sun, Huang, Li, et al, ; Wang, Chen, et al, ), and hydrothermal vein type (e.g., the large‐ and medium‐scale Aerhada, Gaoerqi Ag–Pb–Zn, Jilinbaolige Ag, and Bayandulan Cu deposits; Chen, Zhang, Li, Yang, & Deng, ; Zhang et al, ; Wang, Wang, et al, ; Ke et al, , ; Yu, Liu, et al, ).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDMB trends NE–SW over a distance of >800 km (J. Y. Li, ), and it is one of the most important metallogenic belts in China (Zhai, Deng, & Li, ; J. Y. Li, ; Nie, Jiang, & Zhang, ; Yu, Xue, Cong, Liu, & Duan, ; Liu, ; Wang, ). In recent decades, deposits of porphyry Mo (e.g., Qiyanqin'amu; Sun, Huang, Yan, Yan, & Lü, ; Sun, Huang, Li, Ye, & Zhou, ; Wang, Chen, et al, ), skarn Fe–Zn (e.g., Chaobuleng and Chagan Obao; Chang et al, ; Nie, Zhang, Du, Jiang, & Liu, ; Wang et al, ; Wu et al, ; Zhang et al, ), sedimentary exhalative Cu–Au (e.g., Xiaobaliang; Sun, Zhang, Zhang, & Sun, ; Wang, Deng, Zhang, Xu, & Zhang, ), and hydrothermal vein‐type Zn–Cu, W, and Ag–Au (e.g., Henmaiwenduer, Shamai, and Jilinbaolige; Hu, Nie, He, Zhang, & Liu, ; Cheng et al, ; Liu, Li, et al, ; Zhang et al, ; Li, Fu, et al, ) have been discovered in the EDMB (Figure b). Most studies of the EDMB have focused on the Cu, Au, Fe, W, and Ag mineralization and associated magmatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%