The Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China

Waye, Vicki C.; Xiong, Ping

doi:10.2202/1932-0205.1312

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other judicial approaches are, however, possible and can be effective, albeit challenging in European terms in relation to article 6 of the Convention. Whilst outside the scope of this paper, it is to be noted that the Chinese legal system adopts a process where the judge acts as mediator but may then go on to give an adjudication if the ideal of a settlement is not reached (for a discussion, see Waye & Xiong 2011).…”

Section: Rowing Back From Halseymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-Action Protocols and Pre-Action Dispute Resolution Processes

McCloud¹

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the role of ‘alternative’ dispute resolution in the context of the publication of Part 1 of the Civil Justice Council (CJC) Review of Pre-Action Protocols, to which the author contributed. The relationship between the CJC Report and the Master of the Rolls’ vision for the future of digital justice are considered as are the most salient details of the Report’s proposals, not least mandating dispute resolution engagement, digitalizing portals to manage pre-action steps and gather rich data, and a process for raising alleged failures to comply. The article concludes with consideration of further improvements which the use of technology and rich data may bring, on the near, medium and far horizons. Keywords: alternative dispute resolution; ADR; mediation; early neutral evaluation; ENE; negotiation; pre-action protocol; settlement; artificial intelligence; AI; funnel; digital pathfinder; deep learning; reinforcement; sanctions; non-compliance; rich data.

show abstract

Section: Rowing Back From Halseymentioning

confidence: 99%

Pre-Action Protocols and Pre-Action Dispute Resolution Processes

McCloud¹

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In today's China, informal, community-based mediation outside courts continues to be a preferred means of dispute resolution (Huang, 2010). Facing increasing social conflicts, the central government regards mediation as a flexible, low-cost, and widely applicable method of settling disputes and has recently made significant policy reforms to revitalize civil mediation (Waye and Xiong, 2011). Grand mediation is probably the most popular innovation among these reforms; it aims at mobilizing authorities and resources from different social and governmental agencies to solve problems (Hu, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing mediator identities through questioning in Chinese televised mediation

Zhang

Dong

2023

Discourse Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study, integrating poststructuralist discourse analysis and conversation analysis, analyzes how the question-answer sequences construct mediators’ dynamic identities during Chinese televised mediation. The research shows that different mediators in the team tend to employ different types of questions at varying stages; that questions serve not only to elicit information but also to manage the multilateral talk, to make assertions, to persuade, and to construct different identities; that different mediators’ identities include the manager, the reality tester, the moral educator, the facilitator, and the entertainer. Instead of remaining neutral, they might step out of the neutralistic circle and adhere to the golden mean. The complex representation of these identities is deeply rooted in China’s cultural and socioeconomic background. This study provides a thorough understanding of the interplay between questioning and identity in institutional contexts and the mechanism of Chinese televised mediation.

show abstract

“…11 In general, alternative out-of-court settlements can be utilized for various forms of dispute resolution. 12 Arbitration is a commonly employed method for resolving disputes. Arbitration is a mechanism utilized for the resolution of civil disputes that takes place outside the purview of public courts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Dalam Mengadili Perkara Kepailitan Yang Didalamnya Terdapat Klausula Arbitrase

Cahyani,

Yunani

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Permasalahan atau sengketa sering terjadi didalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. Permasalahan atau sengketa dapat terjadi bahkan disemua bidang kehidupan mulai dari ekonomi, bisnis, keluarga, politik, dan lain lain tanpa terkecuali. Perbedaan pendapat, benturan kepentingan, hingga rasa takut dirugikan kerap menjadi sebab permasalahan atau sengketa tersebut terjadi. Perkembangan era sekarang ini pilihan penyelesaian sengketa tidak hanya melalui proses litigasi (pengadilan). Pihak-pihak yang berperkara dapat memilih atau menentukan penyelesaian sengketa yang mereka harapkan melalui sebuah kesepakatan. Umumnya semua jenis penyelesaian persengketaan bisa dilakukan melalui alternatif penyelesaian di luar pengadilan. Salah satu penyelesaian sengketa yang dipilih adalah melalui Arbitrase. Arbitrase adalah cara penyelesaian suatu sengketa perdata diluar peradilan umum yang didasarkan pada perjanjian arbitrase yang dibuat secara tertulis oleh para pihak yang bersengketa (Pasal 1 angka 1 UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga dalam mengadili perkara Kepailitan yang didalamnya terdapat klausula Arbitrasi yang disepakati para pihak. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan jenis normatif yaitu penelitian yang mendekati masalah dengan norma hukum yang berlaku. Analisis yang digunakan adalah diskriptif kualitatif yaitu dengan menganalisis teori hukum dan perundang-undangan yang bersifat umum. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga tidak hanya mencakup perkara kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban dan pembayaran utang (PKPU) saja, Ketentuan Pasal 303 Undang Undang KPKPU memberikan penegasan bahwa Pengadilan tetap berwenang memeriksa dan menyelesaikan permohonan pernyataan pailit dari para pihak, sekalipun perjanjian utang piutang yang mereka buat memuat klausula arbitrase. Adanya klausula arbitrase dalam perjanjian tidak mengecualikan berlakunya hukum kepailitan. Permohonan pailit tetap dapat diajukan jika syarat-syarat kepailitan yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) jo. Pasal 8 ayat (4) Undang-Undang KPKPU terpenuhi.

show abstract

The Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China

Cited by 9 publications

References 40 publications

Pre-Action Protocols and Pre-Action Dispute Resolution Processes

Pre-Action Protocols and Pre-Action Dispute Resolution Processes

Constructing mediator identities through questioning in Chinese televised mediation

Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Dalam Mengadili Perkara Kepailitan Yang Didalamnya Terdapat Klausula Arbitrase

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About