1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1999.tb02571.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Multiple Choice and Essay Response Questions in Assessing Economics Understanding

Abstract: Efficiency considerations have led to increased use of multiple‐choice questions to assess economics understanding at the secondary and tertiary levels throughout Australia. A multiple‐choice test would suffice if multiple‐choice and essay questions measure the same dimensions of knowledge, as suggested by least squares estimation of the relationship between these two forms of testing. We show a simultaneous equation bias inherent in least squares estimation of the relationship between these two forms. A two‐s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst they are viewed as a less subjective form of assessment (Becker and Johnston 1999), they have been criticised for having a number of pedagogic shortcomings (Douglas et al 2012). Most notably they are often accused of only dealing with surface rather than deep learning (Gibbs 1992).…”
Section: The Value Of Multiple-choice Testing For Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst they are viewed as a less subjective form of assessment (Becker and Johnston 1999), they have been criticised for having a number of pedagogic shortcomings (Douglas et al 2012). Most notably they are often accused of only dealing with surface rather than deep learning (Gibbs 1992).…”
Section: The Value Of Multiple-choice Testing For Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCQs can also be used in a large class size [11], feedback is easier and timely, sometimes immediately especially since it can be administered and marked using computers [12] and generally grading is considered objective [10]. Another advantage of MCQs is that item analysis can be conducted to assess which questions discriminate between good students and slow learners as well as difficulty index of each question (see the attached extract on item analysis on MCQs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple choice questions (MCQs) have a number of advantages, some of the reported advantages may include, enabling examiners to ask a large number of questions on a wider range of course covered [10]. Multiple choice test items can be written to assess various levels of learning outcomes, from basic recall to application, analysis, and evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the advantages of MC items are that they are machine gradable, therefore they increase scoring accuracy (Holder & Mills, 2001), and they are particularly useful in large-scale evaluation projects (Dufresne, Leonard & Gerace, 2002). They facilitate timely feedback for test takers in class (Delgado & Prieto, 2003); and they enable teachers to ask a large number of questions on a wide range of subjects (Becker & Johnston, 1999), therefore a wider range of abilities can be measured. Student difficulties can be diagnosed by analyzing incorrect responses, and it is possible to vary the questions' difficulty level (Simkin & Kuechler, 2005).…”
Section: Multiple-choice Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They facilitate timely feedback for test takers in classes (Delgado & Prieto, 2003); and they enable instructors to ask a large number of questions on a wider range of subject materials (Becker & Johnston, 1999), therefore a wider variety of abilities can be measured. Other advantages are: -Student difficulties can be diagnosed by analyzing incorrect responses.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of MC And Cr Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%