The relationship between musculoskeletal health literacy and upper extremity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the setting of atraumatic shoulder pain

Gruson, Konrad I.; Mahmoud, Shady; Zhu, Nina; Lo, Yungtai; Gruson, Hiroko T; Schwartz, Brittany

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103165

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of functioning usually produce a composite score [1,2]. Different domains of functioning may be of different importance in diverse groups.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Importance of factors determining disability caused by neck pain may vary by gender and age

Saltychev

Widbom-Kolhanen

Pernaa

2022

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective was to investigate if age and gender affect the importance of domains of functioning when grading disability related to neck pain. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis of register-based data on 392 patients undergoing cervical surgery was applied. The main outcome was item loadings on a common factor. The mean age was 55 years and 52% were women. The factor structure was different for both gender and age groups, P < 0.0001. Reading, driving, pain intensity, and recreational activity had the highest loadings while headaches, lifting, and sleep placed the lowest. Reading and pain intensity had bigger weight among men than women, while recreational activity and driving had higher loadings in women. Reading and work were more important for the younger than for the older respondents, while recreational activity was more important for the older respondents.The importance of factors determining disability caused by neck pain may vary by gender and age.

show abstract

“…Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of functioning usually produce a composite score [1,2]. Different domains of functioning may be of different importance in diverse groups.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%