2023
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s400925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Neuron-Specific Enolase and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy

Abstract: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is considered a biomarker for the severity of nervous system diseases. We sought to explore whether serum NSE concentration in ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is related to 3-month functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of acute ischemic stroke patients with anterior circulation infarction receiving MT within 6 h in our stroke center. Favorable outcome and poor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the acute/subacute stroke phase, spreading depolarization has been increasingly recognized as a key pathologic event that occurs spontaneously and contributes to secondary brain injury [ 32 ]. Measuring the content of potential biomarkers (e.g., S100b and neuron-specific enolase) that reflect neuronal damage and blood–brain barrier disruption could be useful for early clinical evaluations and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy [ 33 , 34 ]. However, specific and effective approaches that visualize the suppression of neuronal activity are not yet available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the acute/subacute stroke phase, spreading depolarization has been increasingly recognized as a key pathologic event that occurs spontaneously and contributes to secondary brain injury [ 32 ]. Measuring the content of potential biomarkers (e.g., S100b and neuron-specific enolase) that reflect neuronal damage and blood–brain barrier disruption could be useful for early clinical evaluations and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy [ 33 , 34 ]. However, specific and effective approaches that visualize the suppression of neuronal activity are not yet available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%